Goff Sarah L, Eneanya Nwamaka D, Feinberg Rebecca, Germain Michael J, Marr Lisa, Berzoff Joan, Cohen Lewis M, Unruh Mark
Divisions of General Medicine and Center for Quality of Care Research, and
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):390-400. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07490714. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
More than 90,000 patients with ESRD die annually in the United States, yet advance care planning (ACP) is underutilized. Understanding patients' and families' diverse needs can strengthen systematic efforts to improve ACP.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of patients and family/friends from dialysis units at two study sites. Applying grounded theory, interviews were audiotaped, professionally transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process. Emergent themes were identified, discussed, and organized into major themes and subthemes.
Thirteen patients and nine family/friends participated in interviews. The mean patient age was 63 years (SD 14) and five patients were women. Participants identified as black (n=1), Hispanic (n=4), Native American (n=4), Pacific Islander (n=1), white (n=11), and mixed (n=1). Three major themes with associated subthemes were identified. The first theme, "Prior experiences with ACP," revealed that these discussions rarely occur, yet most patients desire them. A potential role for the primary care physician was broached. The second theme, "Factors that may affect perspectives on ACP," included a desire for more of a connection with the nephrologist, positive and negative experiences with the dialysis team, disenfranchisement, life experiences, personality traits, patient-family/friend relationships, and power differentials. The third theme, "Recommendations for discussing ACP," included thoughts on who should lead discussions, where and when discussions should take place, what should be discussed and how.
Many participants desired better communication with their nephrologist and/or their dialysis team. A number expressed feelings of disenfranchisement that could negatively impact ACP discussions through diminished trust. Life experiences, personality traits, and relationships with family and friends may affect patient perspectives regarding ACP. This study's findings may inform clinical practice and will be useful in designing prospective intervention studies to improve patient and family experiences at the end of life.
在美国,每年有超过9万名终末期肾病(ESRD)患者死亡,但预先护理计划(ACP)的利用率却很低。了解患者及其家属的多样化需求有助于加强系统性努力,以改善预先护理计划。
设计、地点、参与者及测量方法:在两个研究地点,对来自透析单位的患者及其家属/朋友进行了有目的抽样的深入访谈。运用扎根理论,对访谈进行录音、专业转录,并通过迭代过程进行分析。确定、讨论并整理出新兴主题,形成主要主题和子主题。
13名患者和9名家属/朋友参与了访谈。患者的平均年龄为63岁(标准差14),其中5名是女性。参与者的种族包括黑人(n = 1)、西班牙裔(n = 4)、美洲原住民(n = 4)、太平洋岛民(n = 1)、白人(n = 11)和混血(n = 1)。确定了三个主要主题及相关子主题。第一个主题“预先护理计划的既往经历”表明,这些讨论很少发生,但大多数患者希望进行此类讨论。还提到了初级保健医生可能发挥的作用。第二个主题“可能影响预先护理计划观点的因素”包括希望与肾病专家建立更多联系、在透析团队的正负经历、被剥夺权利感、生活经历、性格特征、患者与家属/朋友的关系以及权力差异。第三个主题“关于讨论预先护理计划的建议”包括关于谁应主导讨论、讨论应在何时何地进行、应讨论哪些内容以及如何讨论的想法。
许多参与者希望与他们的肾病专家和/或透析团队进行更好的沟通。一些人表达了被剥夺权利的感觉,这可能通过降低信任度对预先护理计划的讨论产生负面影响。生活经历、性格特征以及与家人和朋友的关系可能会影响患者对预先护理计划的看法。本研究的结果可能为临床实践提供参考,并有助于设计前瞻性干预研究,以改善患者及其家属在生命末期的体验。