Suppr超能文献

烧伤活检定量和半定量培养技术的比较

Comparison of quantitative and semiquantitative culture techniques for burn biopsy.

作者信息

Buchanan K, Heimbach D M, Minshew B H, Coyle M B

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):258-61. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.258-261.1986.

Abstract

Accurate evaluation of bacterial colonization as a predictive index for wound sepsis has relied on a quantitative culture technique that provides exact colony counts per gram of tissue by culture of five serial dilutions of biopsy tissue homogenate. The method, while useful to the physician, is both labor intensive and expensive. In this study 78 eschar biopsies were cultured by a semiquantitative technique that involved the use of 0.1- and 0.01-ml samples of inocula and by the serial dilution method. Exact colony counts from the semiquantitative culture method were available only from cultures containing 10(4) to 10(6) CFU/g of tissue. Other colony counts were reported as less than 10(4) or greater than 10(6) CFU/g. Agreement by category of colony counts between the two methods was 96%. For prediction of wound sepsis, the semiquantitative procedure had a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 93.7%. This method also resulted in an approximately 30% reduction of work units (as defined by the College of American Pathologists) and a 60% reduction in the amount of media for specimen processing. Therefore, this semiquantitative culture technique provides accurate information to the physician while saving both time and materials.

摘要

将细菌定植作为伤口脓毒症预测指标的准确评估,依赖于一种定量培养技术,该技术通过对活检组织匀浆进行五次连续稀释培养,提供每克组织的确切菌落计数。该方法对医生虽有用,但既耗费人力又成本高昂。在本研究中,78份焦痂活检样本采用半定量技术培养,该技术涉及使用0.1毫升和0.01毫升接种物样本以及连续稀释法。半定量培养法的确切菌落计数仅可从每克组织含10⁴至10⁶CFU的培养物中获得。其他菌落计数报告为低于10⁴或高于10⁶CFU/g。两种方法在菌落计数类别上的一致性为96%。对于伤口脓毒症的预测,半定量程序的阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为93.7%。该方法还使工作单位(如美国病理学家学会所定义)减少了约30%,样本处理所需培养基量减少了60%。因此,这种半定量培养技术在为医生提供准确信息的同时,节省了时间和材料。

相似文献

3
An evaluation of burn wound quantitative microbiology. I. Quantitative eschar cultures.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Apr;75(4):532-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/75.4.532.
4
Diagnosis of local infection of a burn by semiquantitative culture of the eschar surface.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1992 Nov-Dec;13(6):639-41. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199211000-00006.
5
Effects of burn wound excision on bacterial colonization and invasion.烧伤创面切除对细菌定植和侵袭的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Feb;111(2):744-50; discussion 751-2. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000041445.76730.23.
9
Assessment of burn wound sepsis by swab, full thickness biopsy culture and blood culture--a comparative study.
Burns Incl Therm Inj. 1983 Nov;10(2):124-6. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(83)90010-4.

引用本文的文献

2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2015 Mar 31;28(1):21-8.
5
Fungal infections in burns: Diagnosis and management.烧伤中的真菌感染:诊断与管理。
Indian J Plast Surg. 2010 Sep;43(Suppl):S37-42. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.70718.
6
Burn wound infections.烧伤创面感染
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006 Apr;19(2):403-34. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006.
7
Burn wound biopsy techniques.烧伤创面活检技术。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Sep;24(3):503. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.3.503-.1986.
8
Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.侵袭性念珠菌病的实验室诊断
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jan;3(1):32-45. doi: 10.1128/CMR.3.1.32.

本文引用的文献

2
Sepsis following burns, trauma, and intra-abdominal infections.
Arch Intern Med. 1982 Oct 25;142(11):2012-22.
3
Quantitative wound cultures in upper extremity trauma.
J Trauma. 1982 Feb;22(2):112-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198202000-00006.
4
An evaluation of burn wound quantitative microbiology. I. Quantitative eschar cultures.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Apr;75(4):532-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/75.4.532.
5
Quantitative assessment of bacterial invasion of chronic ulcers. Statistical analysis.
Am J Surg. 1983 Feb;145(2):260-2. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90075-2.
7
Quantitative assessment of bacterial contamination of open wounds by a slide techniue.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1969;63(4):532-4. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(69)90043-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验