• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进健康的效果研究:对报告对工作年龄成年人身体活动有显著影响的研究方法质量的综述。

Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults.

机构信息

Institute of Movement Therapy and movement-oriented Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Muengersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany.

Center for Health and Physical Activity, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Muengersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 6;16(5):813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050813.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16050813
PMID:30845673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6427597/
Abstract

The methodology of intervention studies on physical activity (PA) promotion is of great importance regarding evidence development in complex interventions. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the methodological quality of those studies which reported statistically significant effects of interventions promoting PA. PUBMED was searched for reviews on PA promotion to identify studies reporting effective interventions with participants of working age (16⁻67 years). Selected reviews were screened and data from primary studies with effective interventions were extracted to assess methodological quality. Forty-six reviews with 600 primary studies were identified, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one studies were conducted as randomized controlled trials, 13 included an intervention control group, 25 measured PA by questionnaire, and 13 included objective measurements. Information on used statistics was often scarce, and long-term follow-up measurements were frequently missing. The overall methodological quality was moderate for randomized studies and low for non-randomized studies; information on methods and results was often lacking. To overcome these methodological issues, standardized guidelines for reporting study results should be considered, not only when publishing results but also when designing studies. This review provides a solid foundation for the development of practical advice for planning application-oriented studies in PA promotion.

摘要

干预性研究方法在促进身体活动(PA)方面具有重要意义,因为它关系到复杂干预措施的证据发展。本综述的目的是提供一份报告,概述那些报告干预措施对促进 PA 具有统计学显著效果的研究的方法学质量。通过 PUBMED 搜索了有关 PA 促进的综述,以确定报告有效干预措施的研究,这些研究的参与者年龄在 16-67 岁之间。对选定的综述进行筛选,并从具有有效干预措施的主要研究中提取数据,以评估方法学质量。共确定了 46 篇综述和 600 篇主要研究,其中 33 篇符合纳入标准。21 项研究为随机对照试验,13 项研究包括干预对照组,25 项研究通过问卷调查测量 PA,13 项研究包括客观测量。关于使用的统计数据的信息往往很少,长期随访测量也经常缺失。随机研究的整体方法学质量为中等,非随机研究的方法学质量为低;方法和结果的信息往往缺乏。为了解决这些方法学问题,不仅在发表研究结果时,而且在设计研究时,都应考虑报告研究结果的标准化指南。本综述为制定实用的 PA 促进应用导向研究规划提供了坚实的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b5d/6427597/00278ab774e4/ijerph-16-00813-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b5d/6427597/6ba95c8bcbb7/ijerph-16-00813-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b5d/6427597/00278ab774e4/ijerph-16-00813-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b5d/6427597/6ba95c8bcbb7/ijerph-16-00813-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b5d/6427597/00278ab774e4/ijerph-16-00813-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults.促进健康的效果研究:对报告对工作年龄成年人身体活动有显著影响的研究方法质量的综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 6;16(5):813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050813.
2
The effectiveness of physical activity interventions in improving well-being across office-based workplace settings: a systematic review.体力活动干预在改善基于办公室工作场所环境的幸福感方面的效果:系统评价。
Public Health. 2018 Jul;160:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 May 16.
3
Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for the promotion of physical activity in older adults: A systematic review.电子健康干预措施在促进老年人身体活动中的有效性:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2018 Mar;108:93-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.026. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents.改善超重或肥胖儿童及青少年学业成绩的生活方式干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 14(3):CD009728. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009728.pub2.
5
Effectiveness of physical activity promotion interventions in primary care: A review of reviews.基层医疗中身体活动促进干预措施的有效性:综述之综述
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76 Suppl:S56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
6
Development and evaluation of two web-based interventions for the promotion of physical activity in older adults: study protocol for a community-based controlled intervention trial.两种促进老年人身体活动的基于网络干预措施的开发与评估:一项基于社区的对照干预试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4446-x.
7
The relationship between return on investment and quality of study methodology in workplace health promotion programs.工作场所健康促进项目中投资回报率与研究方法质量之间的关系。
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(6):347-63. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130731-LIT-395.
8
Promoting physical activity for children and adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: An umbrella systematic review: A review on promoting physical activity in LMIC.在低收入和中等收入国家促进儿童和青少年的身体活动:一项综合性系统评价:关于在低收入和中等收入国家促进身体活动的综述
Prev Med. 2016 Jul;88:115-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.03.025. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
9
Promoting Physical Activity Among University Students: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials.促进大学生身体活动:对照试验的系统评价
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Sep;32(7):1602-1612. doi: 10.1177/0890117117753798. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
10
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Health education "empowerment" digital marketing of consumer products and services: Promoting therapeutic benefits of self-care for depression and chronic pain.健康教育“赋权”消费品和服务的数字营销:宣传自我保健对抑郁症和慢性疼痛的治疗益处。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;10:949518. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.949518. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact Model-Based Physical-Activity Promotion at the Workplace: Study Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study in Germany (KomRueBer Study).基于冲击模型的工作场所体力活动促进:德国混合方法研究的研究方案(KomRueBer 研究)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;18(11):6074. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116074.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews.促进社区老年人身体活动干预措施:综述的系统评价
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180902. eCollection 2017.
2
Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.科学引文倾向于正面结果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
3
How to Tackle Key Challenges in the Promotion of Physical Activity among Older Adults (65+): The AEQUIPA Network Approach.
The effects of long-term physical activity interventions in communities: Scoping review in the Nordic countries.
社区中长期体力活动干预的效果:北欧国家的范围综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Mar;50(2):272-286. doi: 10.1177/14034948211020599. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
如何应对促进老年人(65岁及以上)身体活动的关键挑战:AEQUIPA网络方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 4;14(4):379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040379.
4
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
5
The Effect of Exercise on Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.运动对青少年抑郁症状的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;55(7):580-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 May 10.
6
Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal "Instructions to Authors" in 2014.高影响因子期刊对CONSORT声明的认可情况更新:2014年期刊“作者须知”调查
Trials. 2016 Jun 24;17(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1408-z.
7
Exercise improves quality of life in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.运动改善癌症患者的生活质量:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(13):796-803. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094787. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
8
Compared with what? An analysis of control-group types in Cochrane and Campbell reviews of psychosocial treatment efficacy with substance use disorders.与什么相比?对Cochrane和Campbell关于物质使用障碍心理社会治疗疗效综述中的对照组类型的分析。
Addiction. 2015 Mar;110(3):420-8. doi: 10.1111/add.12799. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
9
How sample size influences research outcomes.样本量如何影响研究结果。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):27-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo.
10
Effectiveness of physical activity promotion interventions in primary care: A review of reviews.基层医疗中身体活动促进干预措施的有效性:综述之综述
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76 Suppl:S56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Sep 26.