Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Hospital and University Teaching Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):789-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
To assess the repeatability of a swept-source biometer in phakic and pseudophakic patients, including astigmatism analysis, and to compare measurement data with those obtained by an optical low-coherence interferometry method.
Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Central Hospital and University Teaching Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary.
Evaluation of diagnostic technologies.
One eye of each patient was examined with the Argos and Aladdin devices. With the Argos, three repeated measurements were performed. Biometric parameters and cross-cylinder power vector components of astigmatism were assessed. Descriptive and repeatability data of the Argos were observed, and Bland-Altman plots were created.
The study comprised 96 eyes (50 phakic and 46 pseudophakic) of 96 patients (mean age 69.22 years and 71.14 years, respectively). The two devices showed a significant difference regarding astigmatism and corneal diameter in the phakic group (measured larger by Argos, P < .05). In the pseudophakic group, only the corneal diameter data were significantly different (measured larger by Argos, P = .02). No other statistically significant differences were observed in either group. An excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was reported on the Argos device in the case of all measured parameters except for the diopter values of astigmatism and the vector values of the astigmatism in the phakic group. In the pseudophakic group, the ICC was moderate in the case of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and good in the case of astigmatism and vectorial data.
The repeatability data regarding the Argos biometer were excellent for all parameters except astigmatism data in both groups and ACD readings in the pseudophakic group. However, only a limited agreement was observed between these devices in both groups.
评估扫频源生物测量仪在有晶状体眼和无晶状体眼患者中的重复性,包括散光分析,并将测量数据与光低相干干涉法获得的数据进行比较。
匈牙利佐博尧州立医院和米什科尔茨大学教学医院。
诊断技术评估。
每位患者的一只眼接受 Argos 和 Aladdin 设备的检查。Argos 进行了三次重复测量。评估生物测量参数和散光的交叉圆柱力向量分量。观察 Argos 的描述性和重复性数据,并创建 Bland-Altman 图。
该研究共纳入 96 例患者(96 只眼)(平均年龄分别为 69.22 岁和 71.14 岁),其中 50 只为有晶状体眼,46 只为无晶状体眼。这两种设备在有晶状体眼组的散光和角膜直径方面存在显著差异(Argos 测量值较大,P<.05)。在无晶状体眼组中,只有角膜直径数据存在显著差异(Argos 测量值较大,P=.02)。在两组中均未观察到其他具有统计学意义的差异。Argos 设备报告的所有测量参数的组内相关系数(ICC)均为优秀,除了有晶状体眼组的散光屈光度和散光向量值以及无晶状体眼组的前房深度(ACD)。在无晶状体眼组中,ACD 的 ICC 为中度,散光和向量数据的 ICC 为良好。
除了两组散光数据和无晶状体眼组的 ACD 读数外,Argos 生物测量仪的重复性数据对所有参数均为优秀。然而,在两组中这两种设备之间仅观察到有限的一致性。