Instrumental variables: Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
作者信息
Keele Luke, Small Dylan
机构信息
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
出版信息
Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun;54(3):543-546. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13130. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Instrumental variables: Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.工具变量：勿因噎废食。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun;54(3):543-546. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13130. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
2
Paying for performance in nursing homes: don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.疗养院的绩效付费：别因噎废食。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Oct;56(10):1959-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01924.x.
3
Please don't throw out the baby with the bathwater.请勿因噎废食。
Nurs Times. 1979 Nov 8;75(45):1923-4.
4
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.不要因噎废食。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:51-2. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308512.
5
Conceptualizing psychotic disorders: don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.对精神障碍的概念化理解：不要因噎废食。
World Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;15(2):133-4. doi: 10.1002/wps.20338.
6
Self-reported hypertension as a public health surveillance tool: Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater.自我报告的高血压作为一种公共卫生监测工具：不要因噎废食。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jun 14;20(8):1215-6. doi: 10.1111/jch.13326.
7
PEEP, p-values, and pulmonary mechanics; don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.呼气末正压、p值与肺力学；勿因噎废食。
Crit Care. 2022 Oct 10;26(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04183-x.
8
Blood glucose control in the ICU: don't throw out the baby with the bathwater!重症监护病房中的血糖控制：勿因噎废食！
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1478-81. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4350-3. Epub 2016 May 9.
9
"Don't Throw the Baby out with the Bathwater".不要把孩子和洗澡水一起倒掉。
Ann Neurol. 2024 Apr;95(4):823. doi: 10.1002/ana.26889. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
10
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater and secure your professional future.不要因噎废食，保障你的职业未来。
Int J Esthet Dent. 2024 Jan 29;19(1):9-11.
引用本文的文献
1
Unlocking economic growth and sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa.释放撒哈拉以南非洲地区的经济增长与可持续发展潜力。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 21;10(12):e33252. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33252. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
2
Association of Rural Hospital Admissions with Access, Treatment, and Mortality for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in Shanxi, China.中国山西农村医院急性心肌梗死患者入院与获得治疗和死亡率的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 24;19(11):6382. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116382.
3
Local Instrumental Variable Methods to Address Confounding and Heterogeneity when Using Electronic Health Records: An Application to Emergency Surgery.利用电子健康记录解决混杂和异质性的局部工具变量方法：在急诊手术中的应用。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Nov;42(8):1010-1026. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221100799. Epub 2022 May 24.
4
Instrumental variables: The power of wishful thinking vs the confounded reality of comparative effectiveness research.工具变量：一厢情愿的力量与比较效果研究中混杂的现实情况
Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun;54(3):537-542. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13129. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
本文引用的文献
1
Graphical Diagnosis of Confounding Bias in Instrumental Variable Analysis.工具变量分析中混杂偏倚的图形诊断
Epidemiology. 2018 Jul;29(4):e29-e31. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000822.
2
How to compare instrumental variable and conventional regression analyses using negative controls and bias plots.如何使用负对照和偏差图比较工具变量分析和常规回归分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):2067-2077. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx014.
3
The Reliability of Instrumental Variables in Health Care Effectiveness Research: Less Is More.医疗保健效果研究中工具变量的可靠性：少即是多。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):9-15. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12527. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
4
Follow Your Heart: Survival Chances and Costs after Heart Attacks-An Instrumental Variable Approach.随心而为：心脏病发作后的生存几率与成本——一种工具变量法
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):16-34. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12509. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Estimating causal effects: considering three alternatives to difference-in-differences estimation.估计因果效应：考虑三种差分法估计的替代方法。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2016;16:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10742-016-0146-8. Epub 2016 May 7.
6
Near/far matching: a study design approach to instrumental variables.近/远匹配：一种工具变量的研究设计方法。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2012 Dec;12(4):237-253. doi: 10.1007/s10742-012-0091-0. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
7
Falsification Testing of Instrumental Variables Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research.比较效果研究中工具变量方法的证伪检验
Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;51(2):790-811. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12355. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
8
How Do You Know Which Health Care Effectiveness Research You Can Trust? A Guide to Study Design for the Perplexed.如何知道哪些医疗保健有效性研究值得信赖？给困惑者的研究设计指南。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 25;12:E101. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150187.
9
Toward a clearer portrayal of confounding bias in instrumental variable applications.旨在更清晰地描绘工具变量应用中的混杂偏倚。
Epidemiology. 2015 Jul;26(4):498-504. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000287.
10
Potential bias of instrumental variable analyses for observational comparative effectiveness research.工具变量分析在观察性比较有效性研究中的潜在偏倚。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 15;161(2):131-8. doi: 10.7326/M13-1887.
Zotero 插件