a National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Department of Oncology , Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
b Montebello Center , The Norwegian Resource Center for Coping with Cancer , Mesnali , Norway.
Acta Oncol. 2019 May;58(5):682-689. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1562210. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
Rehabilitation aims to improve function, but the effects of different programs are not clear. The aims of the present study were to: (1) compare the level of fatigue and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of cancer survivors admitted to a one-week inpatient educational program (IEP) to the general population (NORMS), (2) examine changes in fatigue, HRQOL and physical activity after the IEP and (3) examine the proportions of survivors for female and male separately with clinically relevant improvement (>10% of maximum scale). Cancer survivors ≥18 years, diagnosed with breast-, prostate- or gastrointestinal cancer within the last 10 years, about to attend a one-week IEP were invited to an observational study with a pre-post design. The IEP included lectures, group discussions and physical activity. The participants completed a questionnaire on the arrival day (T0) and three months after the stay (T1). Fatigue was assessed by the Fatigue Questionnaire and HRQOL by Short Form-36. Compared to NORMS, both female and male participants had significantly higher mean levels of fatigue and poorer HRQOL at T0 and T1. From T0 to T1, among all participants physical fatigue was reduced from 12.6 (SD 3.9) to 11.8 (SD 3.8; < .001), mental fatigue from 6.3 (SD 2.2) to 6.0 (SD 2.2; = .044) and total fatigue from 19.0 (SD 5.3) to 17.8 (SD 5.4; = .001). Among female participants, 30% experienced clinically relevant improvement in physical fatigue, 28% in total fatigue and 36% in general health. Of male participants, 31% displayed a clinically relevant improvement in role limitations physical. Participants in the IEP reduced their levels of fatigue and improved aspects of HRQOL, more often observed among female participants than among males. Because of the lack of a control group it is not possible to conclude whether the changes were due to the IEP.
康复的目的是改善功能,但不同方案的效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在:(1)比较接受为期一周的住院教育计划(IEP)的癌症幸存者与一般人群(NORMS)的疲劳水平和健康相关生活质量(HRQOL);(2)检查 IEP 后疲劳、HRQOL 和身体活动的变化;(3)分别检查女性和男性幸存者中比例达到临床相关改善(>最大量表的 10%)的患者。邀请年龄≥18 岁、过去 10 年内被诊断患有乳腺癌、前列腺癌或胃肠道癌、即将参加为期一周的 IEP 的癌症幸存者参加一项前瞻性研究。IEP 包括讲座、小组讨论和身体活动。参与者在抵达日(T0)和住院后三个月(T1)完成一份问卷。疲劳通过疲劳问卷评估,HRQOL 通过简明健康状况调查问卷 36 项版评估。与 NORMS 相比,男性和女性参与者在 T0 和 T1 时疲劳程度更高,HRQOL 更差。从 T0 到 T1,所有参与者的体力疲劳从 12.6(SD 3.9)降至 11.8(SD 3.8; < .001),精神疲劳从 6.3(SD 2.2)降至 6.0(SD 2.2; = .044),总疲劳从 19.0(SD 5.3)降至 17.8(SD 5.4; = .001)。女性参与者中,30%的人在体力疲劳方面有临床显著改善,28%的人在总疲劳方面有临床显著改善,36%的人在一般健康方面有临床显著改善。男性参与者中,31%的人在身体机能受限方面有临床显著改善。参加 IEP 的参与者降低了疲劳水平,改善了 HRQOL 的某些方面,女性参与者比男性参与者更常见。由于缺乏对照组,无法确定这些变化是否归因于 IEP。