Lakha S Fatima, Ballantyne Peri, Badr Hanan, Agboatwala Mubina, Mailis Angela, Pennefather Peter
Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Sociology, Trent University, Faculty of Medicine, Peterborough, Canada.
Pain Res Manag. 2019 Feb 3;2019:3091309. doi: 10.1155/2019/3091309. eCollection 2019.
An increasing proportion of the global chronic pain population is managed through services delivered by specialized pain clinics in global cities. This paper describes the results of a survey of pain clinic leaders in three global cities on barriers influencing chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) management provided by those clinics. It demonstrates a pragmatic qualitative approach for characterizing how the global city location of the clinic influences those results. A cross-sectional prospective survey design was used, and data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative content analysis. Key informants were pain clinicians ( = 4 women and 8 men) responsible for outputs of specialized pain clinics in academic hospital settings in three global cities: Toronto, Kuwait, and Karachi. Krippendorff's thematic clustering technique was used to identify the repetitive themes in the data. All but one of the key informants had their primary pain training from Europe or North America. In Kuwait and Karachi, pain specialists were anesthesiologists and provided CNCP management services independently. In Toronto, pain clinic leaders were part of some form of the multidisciplinary team. Using the results of a question that asked informants to list their top three barriers, ten themes were identified. These themes were artificially organized in three thematic domains: infrastructure, clinical services, and education. In parallel, 31 predefined barriers identified from the literature were scored. The results showed variation in perception of barriers that not only depended on the clinic location but also demonstrated shared experiences across thematic domains. This study demonstrates a simple methodology for informing global and local efforts to improve access to and implementation of CNCP services globally.
全球慢性疼痛患者中,越来越大比例的患者是通过全球城市中专业疼痛诊所提供的服务来管理的。本文描述了对三个全球城市疼痛诊所负责人进行的一项调查结果,该调查涉及影响这些诊所提供的慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)管理的障碍。它展示了一种务实的定性方法,用于描述诊所的全球城市位置如何影响这些结果。采用了横断面前瞻性调查设计,并使用定量和定性内容分析对数据进行了分析。关键信息提供者是在多伦多、科威特和卡拉奇这三个全球城市的学术医院环境中负责专业疼痛诊所产出的疼痛临床医生(4名女性和8名男性)。使用克里彭多夫主题聚类技术来识别数据中的重复主题。除一名关键信息提供者外,其他所有人的主要疼痛培训都来自欧洲或北美。在科威特和卡拉奇,疼痛专家是麻醉医生,并独立提供CNCP管理服务。在多伦多,疼痛诊所负责人是某种形式的多学科团队的一部分。通过一个要求信息提供者列出他们的三大障碍的问题的结果,确定了十个主题。这些主题被人为地组织在三个主题领域:基础设施、临床服务和教育。同时,对从文献中确定的31个预定义障碍进行了评分。结果表明,对障碍的认知存在差异,这不仅取决于诊所位置,还表明在各主题领域存在共同的经历。这项研究展示了一种简单的方法,可为全球和地方改善全球CNCP服务的获取和实施的努力提供信息。