Kim Min P, Nguyen Duc T, Meisenbach Leonora M, Graviss Edward A, Chan Edward Y
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jan;11(1):145-153. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.59.
Minimally invasive pulmonary resection has been shown to provide superior outcomes compared to open thoracotomy. We sought to determine if adding a robot to a general thoracic surgery practice would decrease the total number of open thoracotomy cases.
We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database from 2012-2017. We grouped patients before and after the date of first robot usage with the vascular stapler in pulmonary resections. We analyzed the number of patients who underwent either an elective thoracotomy or were converted to thoracotomy from a planned minimally invasive approach.
There were 389 patients who underwent pulmonary resection between the two time periods. There were 220 patients (56.6%) from 2012-2015 prior to the first use of the robot with vascular stapler and 169 patients (43.4%) from 2016-2017 after the addition of the robot. During the pre-robot time period, 194 of 220 cases (88.2%) were performed with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) while during the post-robot time period, 118 of 169 cases (69.8%) were performed with the robot. A significantly higher number of patients (41 total, 19%) required a thoracotomy in the pre-robot time period compared to the post-robot time period (8 total, 5%, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that adding a robot to the general thoracic surgery program could decrease up to 75% the odds of having thoracotomy [odds ratio=0.25 (95% CI 0.12-0.55, P<0.001)].
The adoption of a robot with a vascular stapler may decrease the number of patients who require a thoracotomy. Potential explanations include an improved ability to perform complex minimally invasive pulmonary resections.
与开胸手术相比,微创肺切除术已显示出更好的疗效。我们试图确定在普通胸外科手术中增加机器人辅助是否会减少开胸手术的总数。
我们对2012年至2017年胸外科医师协会(STS)数据库中前瞻性收集的数据进行了回顾性分析。我们将肺切除术中首次使用机器人血管吻合器前后的患者进行分组。我们分析了接受择期开胸手术或从计划的微创方法转为开胸手术的患者数量。
在这两个时间段内,共有389例患者接受了肺切除术。2012年至2015年首次使用机器人血管吻合器之前有220例患者(56.6%),增加机器人后2016年至2017年有169例患者(43.4%)。在机器人使用前的时间段内,220例病例中有194例(88.2%)采用电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS),而在机器人使用后的时间段内,169例病例中有118例(69.8%)采用机器人手术。与机器人使用后的时间段相比,机器人使用前的时间段内需要开胸手术的患者数量显著更多(总计41例,19%),而机器人使用后的时间段内为8例(5%,P<0.001)。多因素分析表明,在普通胸外科手术中增加机器人辅助可使开胸手术的几率降低多达75%[比值比=0.25(95%CI 0.12 - 0.55,P<0.001)]。
采用机器人血管吻合器可能会减少需要开胸手术的患者数量。可能的解释包括进行复杂微创肺切除术的能力提高。