Dzhambov Angel M
Department of Hygiene and Ecomedicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2018 Dec 1;69(4):340-349. doi: 10.2478/aiht-2018-69-3166.
Previous research has suggested that natural urban environment (green space and blue space) benefit mental health, but only a few longitudinal studies have explored the underlying mechanisms. In this pilot study we aimed to examine mechanisms/variables mediating associations between residential green/blue space and symptoms of anxiety/depression in 109 Bulgarian students from Plovdiv university. The students were followed from the beginning to the end of the school year (October 2017 to May 2018). Residential green space was defined as the mean of the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) in circular buffers of 100, 300, and 500 m around their residences. Blue space was assessed based on its presence in the same buffers. Levels of anxiety/depression were assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. The investigated mediator variables included residential noise (LAeq) and air pollution (NO2), environmental annoyance, perceived restorative quality of the neighbourhood, neighbourhood social cohesion, physical activity, and sleep disturbance. Cross-sectional data (obtained at baseline) showed that higher NDVI correlated with better mental health only indirectly through higher physical activity and restorative quality. Longitudinal (follow-up) data showed improved mental health but no significant effect of mediator variables. Similarly, blue space correlated with better mental health in all models, but physical activity and restorative quality were significant mediator variables only in the cross-sectional analysis. Our findings support that green space and blue space are psychologically restorative features in urban environment. Future research should replicate these findings in the general population and employ longitudinal modelling tailored to the specific mechanisms under study.
以往的研究表明,城市自然环境(绿地和蓝地)有益于心理健康,但只有少数纵向研究探讨了其潜在机制。在这项试点研究中,我们旨在研究109名来自普罗夫迪夫大学的保加利亚学生中,居住绿地/蓝地与焦虑/抑郁症状之间关联的中介机制/变量。这些学生从学年开始(2017年10月)到结束(2018年5月)都接受了跟踪调查。居住绿地被定义为学生住所周围100米、300米和500米圆形缓冲区中归一化植被指数(NDVI)的平均值。蓝地则根据其在相同缓冲区中的存在情况进行评估。焦虑/抑郁水平使用12项一般健康问卷进行评估。所研究的中介变量包括居住噪音(等效连续A声级)和空气污染(二氧化氮)、环境烦恼、对邻里感知的恢复质量、邻里社会凝聚力、身体活动和睡眠障碍。横断面数据(在基线时获得)显示,较高的NDVI仅通过较高的身体活动和恢复质量间接与更好的心理健康相关。纵向(随访)数据显示心理健康有所改善,但中介变量没有显著影响。同样,在所有模型中,蓝地都与更好的心理健康相关,但身体活动和恢复质量仅在横断面分析中是显著的中介变量。我们的研究结果支持绿地和蓝地是城市环境中具有心理恢复作用的特征。未来的研究应在普通人群中重复这些发现,并采用针对所研究具体机制的纵向模型。