RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):308-316. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz038.
To describe current state-level policies in the United States, January 1, 2007-June 1, 2017, limiting high morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) prescribing.
State-level MEDD threshold policies were reviewed using LexisNexis and Westlaw Next for legislative acts and using Google for nonlegislative state-level policies. The websites of each state's Medicaid agency, health department, prescription drug monitoring program, workers' compensation board, medical board, and pharmacy board were reviewed to identify additional policies. The final policy list was checked against existing policy compilations and academic literature and through contact with state health agency representatives. Policies were independently double-coded on the categories: state, agency/organization, policy type, effective date, threshold level, and policy exceptions.
Currently, 22 states have at least one type of MEDD policy, most commonly guidelines (14 states), followed by prior authorizations (four states), rules/regulations (four states), legislative acts (three states), claim denials (two states), and alert systems/automatic patient reports (two states). Thresholds range widely (30-300 mg MEDD), with higher thresholds generally corresponding to more restrictive policies (e.g., claim denial) and lower thresholds corresponding to less restrictive policies (e.g., guidelines). The majority of policies exclude some groups of opioid users, most commonly patients with terminal illnesses or acute pain.
MEDD policies have gained popularity in recent years, but considerable variation in threshold levels and policy structure point to a lack of consensus. This work provides a foundation for future evaluation of MEDD policies and may inform states considering adopting such policies.
描述 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 1 日期间美国各州限制高吗啡等效日剂量(MEDD)处方的现行州级政策。
使用 LexisNexis 和 Westlaw Next 查阅立法法案,使用 Google 查阅非立法性州级政策,以审查 MEDD 门槛政策。查阅每个州的医疗补助机构、卫生部、处方药物监测计划、工人补偿委员会、医学委员会和药剂委员会的网站,以确定其他政策。根据现有政策汇编和学术文献以及与州卫生机构代表的联系,对最终政策清单进行核对。政策类别为:州、机构/组织、政策类型、生效日期、阈值水平和政策例外。
目前,22 个州至少有一项 MEDD 政策,最常见的是指南(14 个州),其次是事先授权(4 个州)、规则/法规(4 个州)、立法法案(3 个州)、拒绝理赔(2 个州)和警报系统/自动患者报告(2 个州)。阈值范围很广(30-300 毫克 MEDD),较高的阈值通常对应更严格的政策(例如,拒绝理赔),而较低的阈值则对应较宽松的政策(例如,指南)。大多数政策排除了某些类别的阿片类药物使用者,最常见的是患有绝症或急性疼痛的患者。
近年来,MEDD 政策越来越受欢迎,但阈值水平和政策结构的差异很大,表明缺乏共识。这项工作为未来评估 MEDD 政策提供了基础,并可能为正在考虑采用此类政策的州提供参考。