• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少高剂量阿片类药物处方:2007-2017 年州级吗啡等效日剂量政策。

Reducing High-Dose Opioid Prescribing: State-Level Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose Policies, 2007-2017.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):308-316. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz038.

DOI:10.1093/pm/pnz038
PMID:30865779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8607298/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe current state-level policies in the United States, January 1, 2007-June 1, 2017, limiting high morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) prescribing.

METHODS

State-level MEDD threshold policies were reviewed using LexisNexis and Westlaw Next for legislative acts and using Google for nonlegislative state-level policies. The websites of each state's Medicaid agency, health department, prescription drug monitoring program, workers' compensation board, medical board, and pharmacy board were reviewed to identify additional policies. The final policy list was checked against existing policy compilations and academic literature and through contact with state health agency representatives. Policies were independently double-coded on the categories: state, agency/organization, policy type, effective date, threshold level, and policy exceptions.

RESULTS

Currently, 22 states have at least one type of MEDD policy, most commonly guidelines (14 states), followed by prior authorizations (four states), rules/regulations (four states), legislative acts (three states), claim denials (two states), and alert systems/automatic patient reports (two states). Thresholds range widely (30-300 mg MEDD), with higher thresholds generally corresponding to more restrictive policies (e.g., claim denial) and lower thresholds corresponding to less restrictive policies (e.g., guidelines). The majority of policies exclude some groups of opioid users, most commonly patients with terminal illnesses or acute pain.

CONCLUSIONS

MEDD policies have gained popularity in recent years, but considerable variation in threshold levels and policy structure point to a lack of consensus. This work provides a foundation for future evaluation of MEDD policies and may inform states considering adopting such policies.

摘要

目的

描述 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 1 日期间美国各州限制高吗啡等效日剂量(MEDD)处方的现行州级政策。

方法

使用 LexisNexis 和 Westlaw Next 查阅立法法案,使用 Google 查阅非立法性州级政策,以审查 MEDD 门槛政策。查阅每个州的医疗补助机构、卫生部、处方药物监测计划、工人补偿委员会、医学委员会和药剂委员会的网站,以确定其他政策。根据现有政策汇编和学术文献以及与州卫生机构代表的联系,对最终政策清单进行核对。政策类别为:州、机构/组织、政策类型、生效日期、阈值水平和政策例外。

结果

目前,22 个州至少有一项 MEDD 政策,最常见的是指南(14 个州),其次是事先授权(4 个州)、规则/法规(4 个州)、立法法案(3 个州)、拒绝理赔(2 个州)和警报系统/自动患者报告(2 个州)。阈值范围很广(30-300 毫克 MEDD),较高的阈值通常对应更严格的政策(例如,拒绝理赔),而较低的阈值则对应较宽松的政策(例如,指南)。大多数政策排除了某些类别的阿片类药物使用者,最常见的是患有绝症或急性疼痛的患者。

结论

近年来,MEDD 政策越来越受欢迎,但阈值水平和政策结构的差异很大,表明缺乏共识。这项工作为未来评估 MEDD 政策提供了基础,并可能为正在考虑采用此类政策的州提供参考。

相似文献

1
Reducing High-Dose Opioid Prescribing: State-Level Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose Policies, 2007-2017.减少高剂量阿片类药物处方:2007-2017 年州级吗啡等效日剂量政策。
Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):308-316. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz038.
2
Changes in Opioid Prescribing Following the Implementation of State Policies Limiting Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose in a Commercially Insured Population.在商业保险人群中实施限制吗啡等效日剂量的州政策后,阿片类药物处方的变化。
Med Care. 2021 Sep 1;59(9):801-807. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001587.
3
The Impact of Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose Threshold Guidelines on Prescribed Dose in a Workers' Compensation Population.吗啡等效日剂量阈值指南对工人补偿人群中处方剂量的影响。
Med Care. 2020 Mar;58(3):241-247. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001269.
4
Clinical Effectiveness of Decision Support for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study.决策支持在慢性非癌痛阿片类药物处方中的临床效果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Value Health. 2020 Feb;23(2):157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2748. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
5
Changes in early high-risk opioid prescribing practices after policy interventions in Washington State.华盛顿州政策干预后早期高危阿片类药物处方行为的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb;56(1):49-60. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13564. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
6
The effects of state rules on opioid prescribing in Indiana.印第安纳州的州法规对阿片类药物处方的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2830-6.
7
Opioid dose risk, clinician and patient characteristics, and adherence to opioid prescribing recommendations in chronic non-cancer pain.阿片类药物剂量风险、临床医生和患者特征,以及慢性非癌症疼痛中阿片类药物处方建议的遵守情况。
J Opioid Manag. 2023 Sep-Oct;19(5):413-422. doi: 10.5055/jom.0815.
8
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
9
Association of the "CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain" With Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing.《美国疾病控制与预防中心慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南》与急诊科阿片类药物处方的关联
J Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;57(5):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
10
Opioid Prescription in Ophthalmology and the Impact of a Decision Support Tool in Reducing Excess Dosing.眼科的阿片类药物处方和决策支持工具对减少过量用药的影响。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov;243:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.06.019. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Psoas: Lumbar Vertebral Index (PLVI) with Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients Aged 60 and Older with Herpes Zoster.腰大肌:腰椎指数(PLVI)与60岁及以上带状疱疹患者带状疱疹后神经痛的关联
J Clin Med. 2024 May 25;13(11):3100. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113100.
2
Impact of 30-day prescribed opioid dose trajectory on fatal overdose risk: A population-based, statewide cohort study.30 天处方阿片类药物剂量轨迹对致命过量风险的影响:一项基于人群、全州范围的队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(3):393-402. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08419-6. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
3
Comparison of the Severity of Zoster-Associated Pain and Incidence of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients with and without Pre-Existing Spinal Disorders at the Same Spinal Nerve Level: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Laws limiting the prescribing or dispensing of opioids for acute pain in the United States: A national systematic legal review.美国限制阿片类药物用于急性疼痛处方或配药的法律:全国系统法律审查。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
2
Assessing The Impact Of State Policies For Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs On High-Risk Opioid Prescriptions.评估州级处方药物监测计划政策对高危阿片类药物处方的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Oct;37(10):1596-1604. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0512.
3
Opioid Prescribing in the United States Before and After the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2016 Opioid Guideline.
同一脊髓神经水平存在和不存在既往脊髓疾病的患者中带状疱疹相关性疼痛的严重程度及带状疱疹后神经痛发生率的比较:一项回顾性多中心研究
J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 22;13(9):1286. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091286.
4
Variation in Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Among Upper-Extremity Surgery Providers.上肢手术医生术后阿片类药物处方的差异。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020 Nov 20;3(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.10.008. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
How opioid prescribing policies influence primary care clinicians' treatment decisions and conversations with patients with chronic pain.阿片类药物处方政策如何影响初级保健临床医生治疗慢性疼痛患者的决策和与患者的沟通。
J Opioid Manag. 2021 Nov-Dec;17(6):499-509. doi: 10.5055/jom.2021.0684.
6
Concurrent Use of Prescription Opioids and Gabapentinoids in Older Adults.老年人同时使用处方阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Apr;62(4):519-528. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.024. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
7
Rapid Discontinuation of Chronic, High-Dose Opioid Treatment for Pain: Prevalence and Associated Factors.慢性大剂量阿片类药物治疗疼痛的快速停药:流行情况和相关因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1603-1609. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07119-3. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Claims-based measures of prescription opioid utilization: A practical guide for researchers.基于索赔的处方阿片类药物使用衡量指标:研究人员实用指南。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Nov 1;228:109087. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109087. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
9
Changes in Prescribing by Provider Type Following a State Prescription Opioid Restriction Law.州处方类阿片限制法出台后,按提供者类型划分的处方变化。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1838-1844. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06966-4. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
10
A Practical Approach to Acute Postoperative Pain Management in Chronic Pain Patients.慢性疼痛患者急性术后疼痛管理的实用方法。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2020 Dec;35(6):564-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
美国疾病预防控制中心 2016 年阿片类药物指南发布前后的阿片类药物处方情况。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Sep 18;169(6):367-375. doi: 10.7326/M18-1243. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
4
Does familiarity with CDC guidelines, continuing education, and provider characteristics influence adherence to chronic pain management practices and opioid prescribing?对美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)指南的熟悉程度、继续教育以及医疗服务提供者的特征是否会影响对慢性疼痛管理实践和阿片类药物处方的依从性?
J Opioid Manag. 2018 Mar-Apr;14(2):103-116. doi: 10.5055/jom.2018.0437.
5
Effects of a prior authorization policy for extended-release/long-acting opioids on utilization and outcomes in a state Medicaid program.缓释/长效阿片类药物预先授权政策对某州医疗补助计划中药物使用情况及治疗结果的影响。
Addiction. 2018 Apr 20. doi: 10.1111/add.14248.
6
Safety concerns with the Centers for Disease Control opioid calculator.美国疾病控制中心阿片类药物计算器的安全问题。
J Pain Res. 2017 Dec 18;11:1-4. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S155444. eCollection 2018.
7
Trends in Deaths Involving Heroin and Synthetic Opioids Excluding Methadone, and Law Enforcement Drug Product Reports, by Census Region - United States, 2006-2015.2006 - 2015年美国按普查区域划分的涉及海洛因及不含美沙酮的合成阿片类药物的死亡趋势以及执法毒品产品报告
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Sep 1;66(34):897-903. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6634a2.
8
The Conversion Ratio From Intravenous Hydromorphone to Oral Opioids in Cancer Patients.静脉注射氢吗啡酮与口服阿片类药物在癌症患者中的换算比率。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Sep;54(3):280-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
9
Opioid Use for Pain Management After Implementation of a Medicaid Short-Acting Opioid Quantity Limit.医疗补助计划中短期阿片类药物限量实施后用于疼痛管理的阿片类药物使用情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):346-354. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.346.
10
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016.美国 2016 年慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Mar 18;65(1):1-49. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1.