Arat Arzu, Burström Bo, Östberg Viveca, Hjern Anders
Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Centre for Health Equity Studies, Karolinska Institutet/Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6597-4.
BACKGROUND: Herd immunity levels of vaccine uptake are still not reached in some high-income countries, usually in countries with persisting social inequities in uptake. Previous studies have focused on factors within one health care system. This study takes a broader health care systems approach by reviewing the socioeconomic distribution of vaccination coverage on the national level in light of structural and organizational differences of primary care for children. METHODS: A systematic literature review of socio-economic patterns of uptake of Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) and/or Diphteria-Tetanus-Pertusis (DTP) in population based studies of children 0-5 years of age living in the 30 European Economic Area (EEA) or European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries and Australia, was carried out using the PRISMA guidelines. The health care system in the countries in the study were categorized by degree of freedom of the primary care provider (hierarchical or non-hierarchical) and whether preventive services were provided in a separate organization (well-baby clinics). RESULTS: The review identified 15 studies from 10 European countries and Australia that fulfilled the criteria. Although the heterogeneity of the socio-economic indicators did not allow for a conclusive meta-analysis, the study pointed towards lower levels of inequities in primary care models with well-baby clinics. In non-hierarchical primary care organizations that also lacked well-baby clinics, socioeconomic gaps in uptake were often found to be large. CONCLUSION: This review indicates that structural and organizational aspects of health care systems for young children are important for equity in vaccine uptake.
背景:在一些高收入国家,疫苗接种的群体免疫水平仍未达到,通常是在接种方面存在持续社会不平等的国家。以往的研究主要关注单一医疗体系内的因素。本研究采用更广泛的医疗体系方法,根据儿童初级保健的结构和组织差异,审视国家层面疫苗接种覆盖率的社会经济分布情况。 方法:按照PRISMA指南,对居住在30个欧洲经济区(EEA)或欧洲自由贸易联盟(EFTA)国家以及澳大利亚的0至5岁儿童的基于人群的研究中麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹(MMR)和/或白喉-破伤风-百日咳(DTP)接种的社会经济模式进行了系统的文献综述。研究中的国家医疗体系根据初级保健提供者的自由度(分层或非分层)以及预防性服务是否在单独的机构(母婴保健诊所)中提供进行分类。 结果:该综述确定了来自10个欧洲国家和澳大利亚的15项符合标准的研究。尽管社会经济指标的异质性不允许进行结论性的荟萃分析,但该研究指出,在设有母婴保健诊所的初级保健模式中,不平等程度较低。在没有母婴保健诊所的非分层初级保健机构中,往往发现接种方面的社会经济差距很大。 结论:本综述表明,幼儿医疗体系的结构和组织方面对疫苗接种的公平性很重要。
Scand J Public Health. 2019-5-17
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000-9-22
BMC Public Health. 2021-7-7
BMC Public Health. 2025-8-25
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024-12-31
BMC Public Health. 2023-9-14
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017-9-21
Int J Equity Health. 2017-1-28
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017-1
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014-1-10