• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国碳交易市场效率:基于方差比检验的证据。

The efficiency of carbon trading market in China: evidence from variance ratio tests.

机构信息

Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, 689 Huadian Road, Baoding, 071003, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(14):14362-14372. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04778-y. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-019-04778-y
PMID:30868455
Abstract

On December 19, 2017, China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced the official launch of the much-anticipated national emissions trading system (ETS), which is a critical period for the transition from the eight carbon emission trading pilot projects to the national market at this stage. Comprehensively evaluating the efficiency of China's eight carbon trading pilots is vital for strengthening the construction of its national ETS. This paper investigates the weak-form efficiency of eight carbon trading markets in China. We use a series of variance ratio tests to identify the efficiency from the market set up to the May 4, 2018, of all markets. The results indicate that the majority of the carbon trading markets are inefficient and only Beijing, Hubei, and Fujian markets are efficient. The China's carbon trading market is gradually maturing and implemented. In addition, we analyze the factors have impact on the market efficiency. It shows that the liquidity, volume, allocation allowance, and transparency in information are significant factors; meanwhile, the regional policy and cross cooperation also are important factors. Finally, this paper puts forward several policy recommendations on how to strengthen the effectiveness of China carbon trading markets based on the empirical results.

摘要

2017 年 12 月 19 日,中国国家发展和改革委员会(NDRC)宣布正式启动备受期待的全国排放交易体系(ETS),这是现阶段从八个碳交易试点项目向全国市场过渡的关键时期。全面评估中国八个碳交易试点的效率对于加强其国家 ETS 的建设至关重要。本文研究了中国八个碳交易市场的弱形式效率。我们使用一系列方差比检验来识别从市场建立到 2018 年 5 月 4 日的所有市场的效率。结果表明,大多数碳交易市场效率低下,只有北京、湖北和福建市场是有效的。中国的碳交易市场正在逐步成熟和实施。此外,我们分析了影响市场效率的因素。结果表明,流动性、成交量、分配津贴和信息透明度是重要因素;同时,区域政策和跨区域合作也是重要因素。最后,本文根据实证结果提出了几条关于如何加强中国碳交易市场有效性的政策建议。

相似文献

1
The efficiency of carbon trading market in China: evidence from variance ratio tests.中国碳交易市场效率:基于方差比检验的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(14):14362-14372. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04778-y. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
2
Do the performance and efficiency of China's carbon emission trading market change over time?中国碳排放交易市场的表现和效率是否随时间变化?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(26):33140-33160. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09168-3. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Assessing market efficiency and liquidity: Evidence from China's emissions trading scheme pilots.评估市场效率和流动性:来自中国碳排放交易试点的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 15;769:144707. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144707. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Time-varying spillovers among pilot carbon emission trading markets in China.中国试点碳市场的时变溢出效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):57421-57436. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19914-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
5
Addressing climate change through a market mechanism: a comparative study of the pilot emission trading schemes in China.通过市场机制应对气候变化:中国试点排放交易计划的比较研究。
Environ Geochem Health. 2020 Mar;42(3):745-767. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00258-x. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Asymmetric dependence structures between emission allowances and energy markets: new evidence from China's emissions trading scheme pilots.排放权与能源市场之间的非对称依存关系:来自中国碳排放交易试点的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(17):21140-21158. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08237-x. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
7
Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China's Eight ETS Pilots.碳排放交易体系(ETS)是一种有效的市场激励型环境监管政策吗?来自中国八个碳排放交易试点的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063177.
8
Governance effects of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation of carbon emission trading policy in China.中国碳排放交易政策在减少污染和碳减排方面的治理效应。
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 4):119074. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119074. Epub 2024 May 4.
9
A New Grey Relational Analysis Model Based on the Characteristic of Inscribed Core (IC-GRA) and Its Application on Seven-Pilot Carbon Trading Markets of China.基于内接核特征的新型灰色关联分析模型(IC-GRA)及其在中国七个碳交易试点市场的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 31;16(1):99. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010099.
10
Has China's Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme Influenced the Carbon Intensity of Output?中国的碳排放权交易试点是否影响了产出的碳强度?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 25;16(10):1854. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101854.