• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估市场效率和流动性:来自中国碳排放交易试点的证据。

Assessing market efficiency and liquidity: Evidence from China's emissions trading scheme pilots.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.

School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Complex System Analysis, Management and Decision (Beihang University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 15;769:144707. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144707. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144707
PMID:33736253
Abstract

Different from the previous studies that evaluated the degrees of carbon market efficiency as constant, the novelty of this work is to capture degrees of market efficiency that are time-varying over time and its static and dynamic relationship with liquidity in China's five emissions trading system (ETS) pilots (Beijing, Guangdong, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hubei) from January 2017 to June 2019. For this purpose, this work employs the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity in mean (GARCH(1,1)-M) model with state space time-varying parameter (Kalman filter), Modified Amihud illiquidity ratio, fixed effect variable intercept panel regression model and panel impulse response analysis. The empirical results are as follows: (1) Shenzhen pilot is the best performer for the market efficiency, followed by Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong and Hubei; although the other four except the Shenzhen pilot are inconsistent with weak-form efficiency, the market efficiency of Beijing pilot has improved and the Hubei pilot has the lowest market efficiency; (2) there are the positively long-term equilibrium relationship between market efficiency and market liquidity of pilots; and (3) market liquidity can positively affect the market efficiency of pilots lasting three months. These findings suggest that the market participation ability, linkages between carbon markets, speculation of low market efficiency and carbon derivatives tools can be considered by unified China's national carbon market.

摘要

与之前评估碳市场效率程度为常数的研究不同,这项工作的新颖之处在于捕捉中国五个排放交易系统试点(北京、广东、上海、深圳和湖北)从 2017 年 1 月到 2019 年 6 月的时间变化的市场效率程度及其与流动性的静态和动态关系。为此,本工作采用了带有状态空间时变参数的广义自回归条件异方差均值(GARCH(1,1)-M)模型(卡尔曼滤波)、修正的 Amihud 非流动性比率、固定效应变截距面板回归模型和面板脉冲响应分析。实证结果如下:(1)深圳试点是市场效率表现最好的试点,其次是北京、上海、广东和湖北;尽管除深圳试点外的其他四个试点均不符合弱式有效,但北京试点的市场效率有所提高,而湖北试点的市场效率最低;(2)试点市场效率与市场流动性之间存在长期均衡关系;(3)市场流动性可以在三个月内对试点的市场效率产生积极影响。这些发现表明,中国统一的国家碳市场可以考虑市场参与能力、碳市场之间的联系、低市场效率的投机行为和碳衍生品工具。

相似文献

1
Assessing market efficiency and liquidity: Evidence from China's emissions trading scheme pilots.评估市场效率和流动性:来自中国碳排放交易试点的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 15;769:144707. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144707. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Asymmetric dependence structures between emission allowances and energy markets: new evidence from China's emissions trading scheme pilots.排放权与能源市场之间的非对称依存关系:来自中国碳排放交易试点的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(17):21140-21158. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08237-x. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
3
The efficiency of carbon trading market in China: evidence from variance ratio tests.中国碳交易市场效率:基于方差比检验的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(14):14362-14372. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04778-y. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
4
Do the performance and efficiency of China's carbon emission trading market change over time?中国碳排放交易市场的表现和效率是否随时间变化?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(26):33140-33160. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09168-3. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
Addressing climate change through a market mechanism: a comparative study of the pilot emission trading schemes in China.通过市场机制应对气候变化:中国试点排放交易计划的比较研究。
Environ Geochem Health. 2020 Mar;42(3):745-767. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00258-x. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China's Eight ETS Pilots.碳排放交易体系(ETS)是一种有效的市场激励型环境监管政策吗?来自中国八个碳排放交易试点的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063177.
7
Has China's Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme Influenced the Carbon Intensity of Output?中国的碳排放权交易试点是否影响了产出的碳强度?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 25;16(10):1854. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101854.
8
Time-varying spillovers among pilot carbon emission trading markets in China.中国试点碳市场的时变溢出效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):57421-57436. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19914-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
9
Evaluating China's pilot carbon Emission Trading Scheme: collaborative reduction of carbon and air pollutants.评估中国的碳排放权交易试点:碳与空气污染物协同减排。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10086-10105. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24685-z. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
10
Measuring Carbon Market Transaction Efficiency in the Power Industry: An Entropy-Weighted TOPSIS Approach.电力行业碳市场交易效率测度:一种熵权TOPSIS法
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Aug 31;22(9):973. doi: 10.3390/e22090973.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of the carbon trading market on urban coordinated development in China.碳交易市场对中国城市协调发展的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(13):20093-20116. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32428-5. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
2
Measuring the Demand Connectedness among China's Regional Carbon Markets.衡量中国区域碳市场之间的需求关联度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114053.