Suppr超能文献

酒精行业企业社会责任组织:它们的推特活动能告诉我们什么关于它们的独立性和优先事项?一项比较分析。

Alcohol Industry CSR Organisations: What Can Their Twitter Activity Tell Us about Their Independence and Their Priorities? A Comparative Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; London WC1H 9SH, UK.

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London W6 6RP, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 12;16(5):892. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050892.

Abstract

There are concerns about the accuracy of the health information provided by alcohol industry (AI)-funded organisations and about their independence. We conducted a content analysis of the health information disseminated by AI-funded organisations through Twitter, compared with non-AI-funded charities, to assess whether their messages align with industry and/or public health objectives. We compared all tweets from 2016 from Drinkaware (UK); Drinkaware.ie (Ireland); and DrinkWise (Australia), to non-AI-funded charities Alcohol Concern (UK), Alcohol Action Ireland, and FARE (Australia). Industry-funded bodies were significantly less likely to tweet about alcohol marketing, advertising and sponsorship; alcohol pricing; and physical health harms, including cancers, heart disease and pregnancy. They were significantly more likely to tweet about behavioural aspects of drinking and less likely to mention cancer risk; particularly breast cancer. These findings are consistent with previous evidence that the purpose of such bodies is the protection of the alcohol market, and of the alcohol industry's reputation. Their messaging strongly aligns with AI corporate social responsibility goals. The focus away from health harms, particularly cancer, is also consistent with previous evidence. The evidence does not support claims by these alcohol-industry-funded bodies about their independence from industry.

摘要

人们对酒精行业(AI)资助的组织所提供的健康信息的准确性及其独立性表示担忧。我们通过 Twitter 对 AI 资助组织传播的健康信息进行了内容分析,并与非 AI 资助的慈善机构进行了比较,以评估其信息是否符合行业和/或公共卫生目标。我们比较了 2016 年 Drinkaware(英国)、Drinkaware.ie(爱尔兰)和 DrinkWise(澳大利亚)的所有推文,以及非 AI 资助的慈善机构 Alcohol Concern(英国)、Alcohol Action Ireland 和 FARE(澳大利亚)。与非 AI 资助的慈善机构相比,行业资助的机构发布有关酒精营销、广告和赞助、酒精定价以及包括癌症、心脏病和怀孕在内的身体健康危害的推文的可能性显著降低。它们更有可能发布有关饮酒行为方面的推文,并且不太可能提到癌症风险,特别是乳腺癌风险。这些发现与先前的证据一致,即这些机构的目的是保护酒精市场和酒精行业的声誉。它们的信息传递与 AI 企业社会责任目标高度一致。这种对健康危害(尤其是癌症)的关注不足也与先前的证据一致。这些有酒精行业资助的机构声称其独立性不受行业影响,证据并不支持这一说法。

相似文献

4
Co-regulation and alcohol industry political strategy: A case study of the Public Health England-Drinkaware Drink Free Days Campaign.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Sep;285:114175. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114175. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
7
Analysis of the accuracy and completeness of cardiovascular health information on alcohol industry-funded websites.
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;31(6):1197-1204. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab135.
8
Public health, academic medicine, and the alcohol industry's corporate social responsibility activities.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Feb;103(2):206-14. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300847. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
10
The illusion of righteousness: corporate social responsibility practices of the alcohol industry.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 3;13:630. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-630.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Alcohol Industry's Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in Portugal.
Port J Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;42(3):240-251. doi: 10.1159/000540348. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
The attributes of public health leadership.
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Mar 1;35(Supplement_2):ii1-ii4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf019.
3
Tobacco industry narratives of e-cigarette use in the UK: a qualitative framing analysis.
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae161.
7
9
(Mis)understanding alcohol use disorder: Making the case for a public health first approach.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Dec 1;253:111019. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111019. Epub 2023 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

3
Partnerships with the alcohol industry at the expense of public health.
Lancet. 2018 Sep 22;392(10152):992-993. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32320-1. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
4
Revisiting the Corporate and Commercial Determinants of Health.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Sep;108(9):1167-1170. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304510. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
6
Promotion of tobacco products on Facebook: policy versus practice.
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):67-73. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054175. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
8
Cross-country comparison of proportion of alcohol consumed in harmful drinking occasions using the International Alcohol Control Study.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Aug;37 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):S45-S52. doi: 10.1111/dar.12665. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
9
Non-Alcoholic Beverage Cues as Specific Comparison Images to Alcohol Image Cues.
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Apr 16;53(5):773-781. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1365087. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
10
How alcohol industry organisations mislead the public about alcohol and cancer.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Mar;37(3):293-303. doi: 10.1111/dar.12596. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验