Suppr超能文献

叙事性病例记录有提前3天预测隔离的潜力:一项混合方法分析。

Narrative Case Notes Have the Potential to Predict Seclusion 3 Days in Advance: A Mixed-Method Analysis.

作者信息

Stepanow Clara, Stepanow Jefim, Walter Marc, Borgwardt Stefan, Lang Undine E, Huber Christian G

机构信息

Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 28;10:96. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00096. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Current risk assessment tools can predict problematic behavior and the need for coercive measures, but only with a moderate level of accuracy. The aim of this study was to assess antecedents and triggers of seclusion. Narrative notes of health care professionals on psychiatric inpatients were analyzed daily starting 3 days prior to seclusion in the case group ( = 26) and compared to a matched control group without seclusion ( = 26) by use of quantitative and qualitative research methods, based on qualitative content analysis. Quantitative measures showed more aggression in the case group with highly significant differences between the groups ( < 0.001) at all measurement times. Seclusion was significantly associated with the total word count of the narrative notes. Subjective emotional expressions by staff were more apparent before seclusion ( = 0.003). Most frequently, subjective expressions regarding "arduous/provocative" ( < 0.001) and "anxious" ( = 0.010) sentiments could be identified in the case group. Description of patients' behavior in the case group included more negatively assessed terms ( = 0.001). Moreover, sleep loss, refusing medication, high contact frequency, demanding behavior and denied requests were present in a significantly higher frequency before seclusion. Expressions like "threatening" ( = 0.001) were found only before seclusion and appeared to have the function of personal risk assessment. The expression "manageable" ( = 0.035) appeared often in difficult situations that could still be handled. Several factors preceding seclusion could be identified. Narrative notes of staff already showed differences 3 days before the escalation. Particularly the word count, the analysis of terms describing patients' behavior, subjective expressions of staff, and terms used as a function of personal risk assessment could help to provide better predictions of aggressive incidents and to prevent coercive measures.

摘要

当前的风险评估工具能够预测问题行为以及采取强制措施的必要性,但准确性仅处于中等水平。本研究的目的是评估隔离的先兆因素和触发因素。从病例组(n = 26)隔离前3天开始,每天分析医护人员关于精神科住院患者的叙事记录,并通过基于定性内容分析的定量和定性研究方法,与未进行隔离的匹配对照组(n = 26)进行比较。定量测量结果显示,病例组的攻击性行为更多,在所有测量时间点,两组之间均存在高度显著差异(p < 0.001)。隔离与叙事记录的总字数显著相关。工作人员的主观情绪表达在隔离前更为明显(p = 0.003)。在病例组中,最常识别出与“艰巨/挑衅性”(p < 0.001)和“焦虑”(p = 0.010)情绪相关的主观表达。病例组对患者行为的描述包含更多负面评价的词汇(p = 0.001)。此外,睡眠剥夺、拒绝服药、高接触频率、苛求行为和请求被拒在隔离前出现的频率显著更高。“威胁性的”之类的表达(p = 0.001)仅在隔离前出现,似乎具有个人风险评估的功能。“可控的”这一表达(p = 0.035)经常出现在仍可处理的困难情况中。可以识别出隔离前的几个因素。工作人员的叙事记录在病情升级前3天就已显示出差异。特别是字数、对描述患者行为的词汇分析、工作人员的主观表达以及用作个人风险评估功能的词汇,有助于更好地预测攻击事件并预防强制措施。

相似文献

1
Narrative Case Notes Have the Potential to Predict Seclusion 3 Days in Advance: A Mixed-Method Analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 28;10:96. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00096. eCollection 2019.
3
Seclusion and enforced medication in dealing with aggression: A prospective dynamic cohort study.
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;39:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
4
Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
6
Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 16;10:491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491. eCollection 2019.
7
Factors associated with use of psychiatric intensive care and seclusion in adult inpatient mental health services.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):51-61. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000731. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
9
Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion.
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;202:142-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118422. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
10
The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2004 Sep;25(6):559-78. doi: 10.1080/01612840490472101.

引用本文的文献

2
Opening the Doors of a Substance Use Disorder Ward-Benefits and Challenges From a Consumer Perspective.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 24;11:580885. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.580885. eCollection 2020.
3
Reliability of Paper-Based Routine Documentation in Psychiatric Inpatient Care and Recommendations for Further Improvement.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 14;10:954. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00954. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
Sleep at night and association to aggressive behaviour; Patients in a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 May;263:275-279. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Reduced Frequency of Cases with Seclusion Is Associated with "Opening the Doors" of a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit.
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 26;9:57. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00057. eCollection 2018.
4
5
Aggression and violence in psychiatric hospitals with and without open door policies: A 15-year naturalistic observational study.
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;95:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
7
Antecedents and consequences of workplace violence against nurses: A qualitative study.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):e116-e128. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13884. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
[Influence of an "Open Door Policy" on Ward Climate: Impact on Treatment Quality].
Psychiatr Prax. 2018 Apr;45(3):133-139. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-121784. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
9
Aggression in psychiatric hospitalizations: a qualitative study of patient and provider perspectives.
J Ment Health. 2016 Dec;25(6):536-542. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1207222. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
Factors associated with use of psychiatric intensive care and seclusion in adult inpatient mental health services.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):51-61. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000731. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验