Stepanow Clara, Stepanow Jefim, Walter Marc, Borgwardt Stefan, Lang Undine E, Huber Christian G
Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 28;10:96. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00096. eCollection 2019.
Current risk assessment tools can predict problematic behavior and the need for coercive measures, but only with a moderate level of accuracy. The aim of this study was to assess antecedents and triggers of seclusion. Narrative notes of health care professionals on psychiatric inpatients were analyzed daily starting 3 days prior to seclusion in the case group ( = 26) and compared to a matched control group without seclusion ( = 26) by use of quantitative and qualitative research methods, based on qualitative content analysis. Quantitative measures showed more aggression in the case group with highly significant differences between the groups ( < 0.001) at all measurement times. Seclusion was significantly associated with the total word count of the narrative notes. Subjective emotional expressions by staff were more apparent before seclusion ( = 0.003). Most frequently, subjective expressions regarding "arduous/provocative" ( < 0.001) and "anxious" ( = 0.010) sentiments could be identified in the case group. Description of patients' behavior in the case group included more negatively assessed terms ( = 0.001). Moreover, sleep loss, refusing medication, high contact frequency, demanding behavior and denied requests were present in a significantly higher frequency before seclusion. Expressions like "threatening" ( = 0.001) were found only before seclusion and appeared to have the function of personal risk assessment. The expression "manageable" ( = 0.035) appeared often in difficult situations that could still be handled. Several factors preceding seclusion could be identified. Narrative notes of staff already showed differences 3 days before the escalation. Particularly the word count, the analysis of terms describing patients' behavior, subjective expressions of staff, and terms used as a function of personal risk assessment could help to provide better predictions of aggressive incidents and to prevent coercive measures.
当前的风险评估工具能够预测问题行为以及采取强制措施的必要性,但准确性仅处于中等水平。本研究的目的是评估隔离的先兆因素和触发因素。从病例组(n = 26)隔离前3天开始,每天分析医护人员关于精神科住院患者的叙事记录,并通过基于定性内容分析的定量和定性研究方法,与未进行隔离的匹配对照组(n = 26)进行比较。定量测量结果显示,病例组的攻击性行为更多,在所有测量时间点,两组之间均存在高度显著差异(p < 0.001)。隔离与叙事记录的总字数显著相关。工作人员的主观情绪表达在隔离前更为明显(p = 0.003)。在病例组中,最常识别出与“艰巨/挑衅性”(p < 0.001)和“焦虑”(p = 0.010)情绪相关的主观表达。病例组对患者行为的描述包含更多负面评价的词汇(p = 0.001)。此外,睡眠剥夺、拒绝服药、高接触频率、苛求行为和请求被拒在隔离前出现的频率显著更高。“威胁性的”之类的表达(p = 0.001)仅在隔离前出现,似乎具有个人风险评估的功能。“可控的”这一表达(p = 0.035)经常出现在仍可处理的困难情况中。可以识别出隔离前的几个因素。工作人员的叙事记录在病情升级前3天就已显示出差异。特别是字数、对描述患者行为的词汇分析、工作人员的主观表达以及用作个人风险评估功能的词汇,有助于更好地预测攻击事件并预防强制措施。