Mashal Nira, Metzuyanim-Gorelick Shlomit
The School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Exp Brain Res. 2019 May;237(5):1315-1324. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05500-7. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
The n-back task is prototypical tool widely used to evaluate working memory (WM) abilities in healthy and clinical populations. Previous studies finding beneficial effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on n-back task performance were limited by the number of n-back "memory loads" utilized and the assessment of performance only immediately following stimulation. Our aims were to investigate both the immediate and lasting effects of six sessions of bilateral tDCS over the DLPFC on n-back performance. We used a 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-back shaped WM task at three time points: pre-stimulation (T1), immediately following a final (6th) stimulation (T2), and 1 month following the final stimulation (T3). Twenty-five right-handed participants were randomly assigned to active or sham stimulation. Performance was evaluated by percentage hits, false alarms, and reaction times (RTs) for correct responses. Results showed lack of improvement in all outcome measures for both groups at T2. Except for general faster RT in the active group, no lasting effect on percentage hits and false alarms was found for all memory loads among both groups at T3. However, lenient analysis indicated improvement in RT for the 1-back memory load among the active group from T1 to T3. These results question the previously found effectiveness of tDCS over the DLPFC in improving short-term n-back performance and cast doubt on its long-term effectiveness.
n-back任务是一种典型的工具,广泛用于评估健康人群和临床人群的工作记忆(WM)能力。先前的研究发现,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作用于背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)对n-back任务表现有有益影响,但这些研究受到所使用的n-back“记忆负荷”数量的限制,并且仅在刺激后立即对表现进行评估。我们的目的是研究对DLPFC进行六次双侧tDCS刺激对n-back表现的即时和持久影响。我们在三个时间点使用了1-back、2-back、3-back和4-back形式的WM任务:刺激前(T1)、最后一次(第6次)刺激后立即(T2)以及最后一次刺激后1个月(T3)。25名右利手参与者被随机分配到主动刺激组或假刺激组。通过正确反应的命中率、误报率和反应时间(RTs)来评估表现。结果显示,两组在T2时所有结果指标均未得到改善。除了主动刺激组的总体反应时间普遍更快外,两组在T3时所有记忆负荷的命中率和误报率均未发现持久影响。然而,宽松分析表明,主动刺激组从T1到T3,1-back记忆负荷的反应时间有所改善。这些结果对先前发现的tDCS作用于DLPFC改善短期n-back表现的有效性提出了质疑,并对其长期有效性产生了怀疑。