• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成为“发达国家”还是不成为?《巴黎协定》对土耳其森林法的影响。

To be "a developed country" or not to be? The effect of the Paris agreement on Turkish forest law.

机构信息

Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Engineering, Bartın University, Bartın, Turkey.

Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Engineering, Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Turkey.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Mar 15;191(4):219. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7379-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-019-7379-2
PMID:30874902
Abstract

The Paris Agreement (PA), which is an important step toward mitigating climate change, has ascribed new responsibilities to the signatory parties that differ from those of the Kyoto Protocol (KP). This study is focused on the new responsibilities and the reasons why Turkey has not yet assigned the agreement into its own domestic law, although it was signed on April 22, 2016. There are several political and legal reasons for this, but the most important is Turkey's membership in the OECD as a developed country. Besides, developing countries shall be supported by the Green Climate Fund (GCF) at a $100 billion budget per year. Turkey needs GCF support in terms of technology transfer, capacity building, and financial in order to achieve the agreement's goals. Turkey has demanded privileged status similar to the one in the KP, i.e., whether or not to be deemed as a developed country.The core aim of the PA is to keep global temperature increases below 20 °C by the year 2030, insomuch as to limit temperature increases even further to 1.50 °C. This goal depends on the mitigation of CO levels, which means that countries should mitigate GHG emissions caused by deforestation and take further actions by primarily abandoning fossil fuels, improving/attaching importance to energy efficiency, and changing/improving land use planning. Within this context, the second part of the study analyzes the efficiency level of forestry legislation and Turkey's climate policies in terms of the responsibilities to be assigned by the PA. The analysis is based on the question as to what extent the Turkish forestry legislation fulfills the responsibilities ascribed by the PA for preventing deforestation. Consequently, it has been concluded that eight criteria determined by the PA are not adequately included in the Turkish forestry legislation and shall require an amendment on a large scale, particularly when Turkey is deemed as a developed country.

摘要

《巴黎协定》(PA)是缓解气候变化的重要一步,它赋予了签署方不同于《京都议定书》(KP)的新责任。本研究重点关注新责任以及土耳其尽管于 2016 年 4 月 22 日签署了该协议,但尚未将其纳入本国法律的原因。这存在一些政治和法律方面的原因,但最重要的原因是土耳其作为一个发达国家加入了经合组织。此外,每年应向绿色气候基金(GCF)提供 1000 亿美元预算,以支持发展中国家。土耳其需要 GCF 在技术转让、能力建设和财政方面提供支持,以实现协议目标。土耳其要求获得类似于 KP 中的特权地位,即无论是否被视为发达国家。PA 的核心目标是在 2030 年之前将全球气温升幅控制在 20°C 以下,从而进一步将气温升幅限制在 1.50°C 以内。这一目标取决于 CO 水平的缓解,这意味着各国应减少因森林砍伐而导致的温室气体排放,并采取进一步行动,主要是放弃化石燃料,提高/重视能源效率,以及改变/改进土地利用规划。在这方面,研究的第二部分根据 PA 赋予的责任,分析林业立法和土耳其气候政策的效率水平。分析基于以下问题:土耳其林业立法在多大程度上履行了 PA 赋予的防止森林砍伐的责任。因此,结论是,PA 确定的八项标准没有充分包含在土耳其林业立法中,需要进行大规模修订,特别是当土耳其被视为发达国家时。

相似文献

1
To be "a developed country" or not to be? The effect of the Paris agreement on Turkish forest law.成为“发达国家”还是不成为?《巴黎协定》对土耳其森林法的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Mar 15;191(4):219. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7379-2.
2
Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.设计一个保护发展中国家森林的碳市场。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1875-88. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1037.
3
Effects of national forest-management regimes on unprotected forests of the Himalaya.国家森林管理体制对喜马拉雅山脉未受保护森林的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Dec;31(6):1271-1282. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12927. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
4
National mitigation potential from natural climate solutions in the tropics.热带地区通过自然气候解决方案实现国家缓解潜力。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 16;375(1794):20190126. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0126. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
Linking Attitudes, Policy, and Forest Cover Change in Buffer Zone Communities of Chitwan National Park, Nepal.尼泊尔奇特旺国家公园缓冲区社区的态度、政策与森林覆盖变化的关联
Environ Manage. 2016 Jun;57(6):1292-303. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0682-6. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
6
Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector.农业、林业和其他土地利用(AFOLU)部门温室气体减排的协同效益、权衡取舍、障碍和政策。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Oct;20(10):3270-90. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12591. Epub 2014 May 8.
7
Transformation of Plantation Forestry Productivity for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation.为应对气候变化而转变人工林生产力。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):a041670. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041670.
8
State ownership of forests from different angles: policy, economics, and law.森林的国家所有权:政策、经济和法律视角。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Jul 20;191(8):502. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7641-7.
9
Forests, carbon and global climate.森林、碳与全球气候。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1567-91. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1020.
10
Policy Coherence and Interplay between Climate Change Adaptation Policies and the Forestry Sector in Nepal.尼泊尔适应气候变化政策与林业部门的政策一致性和相互作用。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jun;61(6):968-980. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1027-4. Epub 2018 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Turkish groundwater legislation and policy regarding international principles and conventions.分析土耳其地下水立法和政策与国际原则和公约的关系。
Water Sci Technol. 2014;69(10):2155-65. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.112.
2
Climate change and human health: present and future risks.气候变化与人类健康:当前及未来风险
Lancet. 2006 Mar 11;367(9513):859-69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3.
3
Impact of regional climate change on human health.区域气候变化对人类健康的影响。
Nature. 2005 Nov 17;438(7066):310-7. doi: 10.1038/nature04188.
4
Climate change: potential impact on plant diseases.气候变化:对植物病害的潜在影响
Environ Pollut. 2000 Jun;108(3):317-26. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00210-9.