International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Environ Manage. 2018 Jun;61(6):968-980. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1027-4. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
Least Developed Countries are likely to be hit the hardest by climate change and need focused efforts towards adaptation. Nepal recognizes that it needs to integrate climate change adaptation into various policies, but limited understanding of how to make these policies coherent is among the factors that hinder effective adaptation action. This can lead to wasted resources and lost opportunities. This paper applies concepts from policy coherence for development frameworks and policy content analysis to examine coherence in Nepal's climate and forest policies-and discusses the factors hindering effective implementation. The policies are analyzed at the horizontal/external level at three layers-motivation, measures, and planned implementation process. The paper finds that policies are more consistent on motivation level and adaptation measures, but are less coherent on implementation. The National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) is more explicit in identifying institutions, organizations, roles and responsibilities, resource allocation (financial), and a monitoring and evaluation plan for climate change adaptation while other policies such as Climate Change Policy 2011, National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2014-2020, Forest Policy 2015, and Forest Sector Strategy 2016 have critical gaps in this area. This paper conclude that formulation of a policy, articulating targets, and mobilizing financial resources are in themselves not sufficient to effectively address climate change adaptation. Policy-based legislation is required, together with development of a supportive collaborative multi-stakeholder approach at different levels of governance, backed up by effective, collaborative monitoring and enforcement.
最不发达国家最有可能受到气候变化的严重影响,需要有针对性地努力适应。尼泊尔认识到需要将气候变化适应纳入各种政策,但对如何使这些政策协调一致的理解有限,这是阻碍有效适应行动的因素之一。这可能导致资源浪费和错失机会。本文应用政策一致性发展框架和政策内容分析的概念,审查尼泊尔气候和森林政策的一致性,并讨论阻碍有效执行的因素。政策在三个层面上进行了横向/外部分析——动机、措施和计划实施过程。本文发现,政策在动机层面和适应措施方面更为一致,但在实施方面则不太一致。国家适应行动计划(NAPA)在确定机构、组织、角色和责任、资源分配(财务)以及气候变化适应监测和评估计划方面更加明确,而其他政策,如 2011 年气候变化政策、2014-2020 年国家生物多样性战略和行动计划、2015 年森林政策和 2016 年森林部门战略,在这方面存在关键差距。本文认为,制定政策、明确目标和调动财政资源本身不足以有效应对气候变化适应。需要基于政策的立法,以及在各级治理中发展支持性的合作多方利益攸关方办法,并辅之以有效的、合作性的监测和执行。
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2017-9
Health Policy Plan. 2024-4-10
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-11-30
J Environ Manage. 2023-6-15
Health Policy Plan. 2024-4-10
Environ Manage. 2012-6-17