Department of General Dental Practice, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait.
Ministry of Health, Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah Dental Specialty Center, Periodontics Department, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Int Dent J. 2023 Oct;73(5):717-723. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
The aim of this study was to compare peri-implant clinical and radiographic status and levels of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) in waterpipe users and cigarette smokers.
Waterpipe users, cigarette smokers, and never smokers were included. Demographic details were collected using a questionnaire. Characteristics of implants (dimensions, jaw location, depth of placement, insertion torque, and duration in function) were recorded. Peri-implant modified plaque and gingival indices (mPI and mGI), probing depth (PD), and crestal bone loss (CBL) were recorded in all groups. Volume of PISF and levels of AGEs were determined using standard techniques. Sample-size estimation was done on data from a pilot investigation, and correlation between clinicoradiographic and immunoinflammatory parameters was assessed using logistic regression models. Probability values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
In all, 25, 25, and 24 cigarette smokers, never smokers, and waterpipe users, respectively, were examined. All participants were male and had comparable mean ages. Cigarette smokers and waterpipe users had a smoking history of 20.2 ± 3.5 years and 18.8 ± 0.6 years, respectively. The mPI (P < .01), CBL (P < .01), PD (P < 0.01), and mGI (P < .01) were significantly higher in cigarette smokers and waterpipe users than never smokers. There was no significant difference in clinicoradiographic status and AGE concentrations in waterpipe users and cigarette smokers. A statistically significant correlation was recorded between AGEs and PD in cigarette smokers (P < .01) and waterpipe users (P < .01).
Waterpipe usage is not less hazardous to peri-implant tissue health than conventional cigarette smoking. It is imperative to caution patients with dental implants about the detrimental effects of tobacco products on oral health.
本研究旨在比较水烟使用者和香烟吸烟者的种植体周围临床和影像学状况以及种植体周围龈沟液(PISF)中晚期糖基化终产物(AGEs)水平。
纳入水烟使用者、香烟吸烟者和从不吸烟者。使用问卷收集人口统计学资料。记录植入物的特征(尺寸、颌骨位置、植入深度、插入扭矩和功能持续时间)。在所有组中记录种植体周围改良菌斑和牙龈指数(mPI 和 mGI)、探诊深度(PD)和牙槽骨丧失(CBL)。使用标准技术确定 PISF 的体积和 AGEs 水平。样本量估计是基于初步调查的数据进行的,使用逻辑回归模型评估临床影像学和免疫炎症参数之间的相关性。概率值 <.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
共有 25 名、25 名和 24 名香烟吸烟者、从不吸烟者和水烟使用者分别接受了检查。所有参与者均为男性,年龄相当。香烟吸烟者和水烟使用者的吸烟史分别为 20.2 ± 3.5 年和 18.8 ± 0.6 年。香烟吸烟者和水烟使用者的 mPI(P <.01)、CBL(P <.01)、PD(P < 0.01)和 mGI(P <.01)明显高于从不吸烟者。水烟使用者和香烟吸烟者的临床影像学状况和 AGE 浓度没有显著差异。在香烟吸烟者(P <.01)和水烟使用者(P <.01)中,记录到 AGEs 与 PD 之间存在统计学显著相关性。
水烟的使用对种植体周围组织的健康危害不亚于传统香烟吸烟。有必要告诫接受牙种植体治疗的患者,烟草制品对口腔健康有不良影响。