Nguyen Hung, Shrestha Sangam, Tran Duc, Shafi Adib, Draghici Sorin, Nguyen Tin
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.
Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Front Genet. 2019 Mar 5;10:155. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00155. eCollection 2019.
A recent focus of computational biology has been to integrate the complementary information available in molecular profiles as well as in multiple network databases in order to identify connected regions that show significant changes under different conditions. This allows for capturing dynamic and condition-specific mechanisms of the underlying phenomena and disease stages. Here we review 22 such integrative approaches for active module identification published over the last decade. This article only focuses on tools that are currently available for use and are well-maintained. We compare these methods focusing on their primary features, integrative abilities, network structures, mathematical models, and implementations. We also provide real-world scenarios in which these methods have been successfully applied, as well as highlight outstanding challenges in the field that remain to be addressed. The main objective of this review is to help potential users and researchers to choose the best method that is suitable for their data and analysis purpose.
计算生物学最近的一个重点是整合分子图谱以及多个网络数据库中可用的互补信息,以便识别在不同条件下显示出显著变化的连通区域。这有助于捕捉潜在现象和疾病阶段的动态及特定条件机制。在这里,我们回顾了过去十年间发表的22种用于识别活性模块的此类整合方法。本文仅关注目前可供使用且维护良好的工具。我们比较这些方法,重点关注它们的主要特征、整合能力、网络结构、数学模型和实现方式。我们还提供了这些方法已成功应用的实际场景,并突出了该领域仍有待解决的突出挑战。本综述的主要目的是帮助潜在用户和研究人员选择最适合其数据和分析目的的方法。