• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

算术能力与风险素养:我们目前学到了什么?

Numeracy and Risk Literacy: What Have We Learned so Far?

作者信息

Garcia-Retamero Rocio, Sobkow Agata, Petrova Dafina, Garrido Dunia, Traczyk Jakub

机构信息

Universidad de Granada (Spain).

SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland).

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2019 Mar 20;22:E10. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.16.

DOI:10.1017/sjp.2019.16
PMID:30892170
Abstract

Numerical skills are essential to make informed decisions in our daily life. Unfortunately, many people lack basic numeracy, which limits their ability to accurately interpret risks (i.e., risk literacy). In this paper, we provide an overview of research investigating the role of numeracy in two prominent domains, where most research was concentrated, health and finance. We summarize what has been learned so far in these domains and suggest promising venues for future research. We conclude that it is important to conduct interventions to improve numeracy in less numerate individuals and to help them make informed decisions and achieve better life outcomes.

摘要

数字技能对于在我们日常生活中做出明智决策至关重要。不幸的是,许多人缺乏基本的算术能力,这限制了他们准确解读风险的能力(即风险素养)。在本文中,我们概述了关于算术能力在两个突出领域(大多数研究集中于此),即健康和金融领域所起作用的研究。我们总结了目前在这些领域所学到的知识,并提出了未来研究的有前景的方向。我们得出结论,对算术能力较低的个体进行干预以提高其算术能力,并帮助他们做出明智决策并取得更好的生活成果,这一点很重要。

相似文献

1
Numeracy and Risk Literacy: What Have We Learned so Far?算术能力与风险素养:我们目前学到了什么?
Span J Psychol. 2019 Mar 20;22:E10. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.16.
2
Improving risk literacy in surgeons.提高外科医生的风险认知能力。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1156-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
3
Effects of Thinking Dispositions, General Ability, Numeracy, and Instructional Set on Judgments and Decision-Making.思维倾向、一般能力、计算能力及教学设置对判断与决策的影响
Psychol Rep. 2020 Apr;123(2):341-370. doi: 10.1177/0033294118806473. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
4
Empirical relationships between numeracy and treatment decision making: A scoping review of the literature.算术能力与治疗决策之间的实证关系:文献综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):310-325. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
5
Investigating the relationship between two home numeracy measures: A questionnaire and observations during Lego building and book reading.探究两种家庭算术能力测量方法之间的关系:一份问卷以及乐高积木搭建和阅读书籍过程中的观察。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2018 Jun;36(2):354-370. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12235. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Financial literacy: Do people know the ABCs of finance?金融知识:人们了解金融基础知识吗?
Public Underst Sci. 2015 Apr;24(3):260-71. doi: 10.1177/0963662514564516.
7
Numeracy and the Motivational Mind: The Power of Numeric Self-efficacy.数字素养与动机思维:数字自我效能感的力量。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Aug;42(6):729-740. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221099904. Epub 2022 May 18.
8
Little Evidence That Socioeconomic Status Modifies Heritability of Literacy and Numeracy in Australia.几乎没有证据表明社会经济地位会改变澳大利亚读写能力和计算能力的遗传性。
Child Dev. 2019 Mar;90(2):623-637. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12920. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics.设计促进风险素养的视觉辅助工具:健康研究与循证设计启发法的系统综述
Hum Factors. 2017 Jun;59(4):582-627. doi: 10.1177/0018720817690634. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
10
What are standardized literacy and numeracy tests testing? Evidence of the domain-general contributions to students' standardized educational test performance.标准化读写和计算测试测试的是什么?对学生标准化教育考试表现的领域一般性贡献的证据。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Mar;87(1):108-122. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12138. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Dementia risk estimation in persons at risk and the predictive turn in Alzheimer's disease-The PreTAD project: Study protocol with an ethical, clinical, linguistic, and legal approach.阿尔茨海默病高危人群的痴呆风险评估及预测转变——PreTAD项目:一项采用伦理、临床、语言和法律方法的研究方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0319868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319868. eCollection 2025.
2
Numerate people are less likely to be biased by regular science reporting: the critical roles of scientific reasoning and causal misunderstanding.有数字素养的人不太可能受到常规科学报道的影响:科学推理和因果误解的关键作用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 15;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00641-6.
3
Breast Cancer Knowledge Among Amish and Mennonite Women.
美国阿米什和门诺派妇女的乳腺癌知识。
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Dec;39(6):691-697. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02452-7. Epub 2024 May 14.
4
The relationship between numerical magnitude processing and math anxiety, and their joint effect on adult math performance, varied by indicators of numerical tasks.数字大小处理与数学焦虑之间的关系,以及它们对成人数学成绩的联合影响,因数字任务的指标而异。
Cogn Process. 2024 Aug;25(3):421-442. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01186-0. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
5
Motivated reasoning about climate change and the influence of Numeracy, Need for Cognition, and the Dark Factor of Personality.气候变化的动机推理与计算能力、认知需求以及人格的黑暗因素的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5615. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55930-9.
6
Picture this: Evaluating the efficacy of genetic counseling visual aids.想象一下这种情况:评估遗传咨询视觉辅助工具的功效。
J Genet Couns. 2024 Dec;33(6):1365-1374. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1862. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
The link between cognitive abilities and risk preference depends on measurement.认知能力与风险偏好之间的联系取决于测量方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 30;13(1):21151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47844-9.
8
How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.人们如何处理不同形式的统计信息?对认知努力、表示不一致和个体差异的洞察。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):803-820. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231202505. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
9
Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments.抄近道:离散选择实验中的简化启发式方法。
Patient. 2023 Jul;16(4):301-315. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00625-y. Epub 2023 May 2.
10
Cocreation with Dutch patients of decision-relevant information to support shared decision-making about adjuvant treatment in breast cancer care.与荷兰患者共同制定与决策相关的信息,以支持在乳腺癌护理中关于辅助治疗的共同决策。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1664-1677. doi: 10.1111/hex.13510. Epub 2022 May 17.