Suppr超能文献

权力类型、工作投入与组织公民行为之间的关系。

The Relationship between Power Type, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors.

机构信息

Division of Business, Yeungnam University College, 170 Hyeonchung-ro, Nam-gu, Daegu 42415, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 20;16(6):1015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061015.

Abstract

The focus of this study is to investigate if power type improves organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) through work engagement. Based on existing research, power can be classified into two main types: coercive and non-coercive power. Coercive power is divided into the categories of coercion, reward, and legitimate power, and non-coercive power can be divided into information, expert, and reference power. Therefore, this study examines what kind of relationship is formed in the work engagement of organization members based on power type, and ultimately empirically investigates the effects on OCB. Although it is very important in organizational research, no study has yet been conducted on the relationships between power type, work engagement, and OCB. The survey targets of this study were the companies listed on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI), a stock market in South Korea. The companies listed on the KOSPI are the representative companies of South Korea, as announced by the South Korean government based on their market representativeness, liquidity, and industry representativeness. This study sheds new light on the relationships between power type, work engagement, and OCB which have been overlooked from both the academic and practical perspectives. Based on this study, it is expected that power types that have practical influence will be further investigated, and the plans required for the maintenance of better relationships in an organization could then be established.

摘要

本研究的重点是探讨权力类型是否通过工作投入来提高组织公民行为(OCB)。根据现有研究,权力可以分为两种主要类型:强制性权力和非强制性权力。强制性权力分为强制、奖励和合法权力,非强制性权力可以分为信息、专家和参考权力。因此,本研究考察了组织成员的工作投入基于权力类型形成的什么样的关系,并最终从实证角度研究了对 OCB 的影响。尽管它在组织研究中非常重要,但目前还没有关于权力类型、工作投入和 OCB 之间关系的研究。本研究的调查对象是韩国综合股价指数(KOSPI)上市的公司,KOSPI 是韩国政府根据市场代表性、流动性和行业代表性宣布的韩国代表性公司。本研究从学术和实践两个角度出发,对权力类型、工作投入和 OCB 之间被忽视的关系进行了新的探讨。基于这项研究,预计将进一步研究具有实际影响力的权力类型,并制定组织中更好关系维护所需的计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d3/6466222/f147bb105e5c/ijerph-16-01015-g001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
How and When Are Job Crafters Engaged at Work?工作构建者在何时何地参与工作?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 28;15(10):2138. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102138.
8
Job burnout.职业倦怠
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验