Tomes Colin D, Lewis Matthew D
Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, AU.
Department of Health, Nutrition and Exercise Science, Messiah College, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2019 Mar 1;12(6):536-546. doi: 10.70252/PJNG8109. eCollection 2019.
The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a tool used to assess fundamental movement patterns and has been utilized to determine movement readiness of tactical athletes. However, tactical athletes rarely perform tasks without load carriage, and limited research evaluating loaded tactical personnel via the FMS has been conducted. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to determine if ballistic vest wear results in movement deficits as evaluated by the FMS. A convenience sample of college students ( = 31) completed test sessions in loaded and unloaded conditions. Subjects completed each FMS movement and indicated perceived effort on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Sign test was used to determine difference between FMS composite and component scores collected under each condition. The level of significance was set at < 0.05. A significant ( < 0.001) difference in FMS composite scores was identified between loading conditions. Significant FMS score changes between load conditions were identified in the dominant side in-line lunge ( < 0.01), non-dominant side in-line lunge ( < 0.01), dominant shoulder mobility ( < 0.01), non-dominant shoulder mobility ( < 0.01), and non-dominant rotary stability ( = 0.01). Our data indicate ballistic vest wear reduces overall functional movement capacity, as well as mobility related to certain individual FMS components in the population examined. Additionally, results suggest subjects may better tolerate additional load carriage when completing tasks on their dominant side. These results raise important questions regarding design, fit, and task completion for tactical athletes utilizing a ballistic vest.
功能性动作筛查(FMS)是一种用于评估基本动作模式的工具,已被用于确定战术运动员的动作准备情况。然而,战术运动员在执行任务时很少不携带负重,并且通过FMS评估负重战术人员的研究有限。因此,本研究的主要目的是确定穿着防弹背心是否会导致FMS评估的动作缺陷。选取了一个便利样本的大学生(n = 31),他们在负重和非负重条件下完成测试环节。受试者完成每个FMS动作,并在视觉模拟量表(VAS)上表明主观用力程度。采用符号检验来确定每种条件下收集的FMS综合得分和分项得分之间的差异。显著性水平设定为p < 0.05。在负重条件之间,FMS综合得分存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。在负重条件之间,优势侧直线弓步(p < 0.01)、非优势侧直线弓步(p < 0.01)、优势侧肩部灵活性(p < 0.01)、非优势侧肩部灵活性(p < 0.01)和非优势侧旋转稳定性(p = 0.01)的FMS得分有显著变化。我们的数据表明,穿着防弹背心会降低整体功能性动作能力,以及在所研究人群中与某些FMS分项相关的灵活性。此外,结果表明受试者在优势侧完成任务时可能对额外负重的耐受性更好。这些结果对使用防弹背心的战术运动员的设计、合身性和任务完成提出了重要问题。