• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫情应对中的信任技术:2014 - 2016年西非埃博拉疫情期间的开放性、反思性与问责制

Technologies of trust in epidemic response: openness, reflexivity and accountability during the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa.

作者信息

Ryan Molly J, Giles-Vernick Tamara, Graham Janice E

机构信息

Pediatrics (Infectious Diseases), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Unité d'Epidémiologie des Maladies Emergentes, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Feb 13;4(1):e001272. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001272. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001272
PMID:30899567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6407545/
Abstract

Trust is an essential component of successful cooperative endeavours. The global health response to the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola outbreak confronted historically tenuous regional relationships of trust. Challenging sociopolitical contexts and initially inappropriate communication strategies impeded trustworthy relationships between communities and responders during the epidemic. Social scientists affiliated with the Ebola 100-Institut Pasteur project interviewed approximately 160 local, national and international responders holding a wide variety of roles during the epidemic. Focusing on responder's experiences of communities' trust during the epidemic, this qualitative study identifies and explores social techniques for effective emergency response. The response required individuals with diverse knowledges and experiences. Responders' included on-the-ground social mobilisers, health workers and clinicians, government officials, ambulance drivers, contact tracers and many more. We find that trust was fostered through open, transparent and reflexive communication that was adaptive and accountable to community-led response efforts and to real-time priorities. We expand on these findings to identify 'technologies of trust' that can be used to promote actively legitimate trustworthy relationships. Responders engaged the social technologies of openness (a willingness and genuine effort to incorporate multiple perspectives), reflexivity (flexibly responsive to context and ongoing dialogue) and accountability (taking responsibility for local contexts and consequences) to facilitate relations of trust. Technologies of trust contribute to the development of a framework of practical techniques to improve the acceptance and effectiveness of future emergency response strategies.

摘要

信任是成功合作努力的重要组成部分。全球对2014 - 2016年西非埃博拉疫情的应对面临着历史上脆弱的区域信任关系。具有挑战性的社会政治背景以及最初不恰当的沟通策略阻碍了疫情期间社区与应对者之间建立可信赖的关系。与埃博拉100 - 巴斯德研究所项目相关的社会科学家采访了大约160名在疫情期间担任各种角色的当地、国家和国际应对者。这项定性研究聚焦于应对者在疫情期间社区信任的经历,识别并探索有效的应急响应社会技巧。应对疫情需要具备不同知识和经验的人员。应对者包括实地社会动员者、卫生工作者和临床医生、政府官员、救护车司机、接触者追踪员等等。我们发现,通过开放、透明和反思性的沟通可以促进信任,这种沟通具有适应性,并对社区主导的应对努力和实时优先事项负责。我们进一步阐述这些发现,以确定可用于积极促进合法信任关系的“信任技术”。应对者运用了开放(愿意并真诚努力纳入多种观点)、反思(灵活应对情境和持续对话)和问责(对当地情况和后果负责)等社会技术来促进信任关系。信任技术有助于构建一个实用技术框架,以提高未来应急响应策略的接受度和有效性。

相似文献

1
Technologies of trust in epidemic response: openness, reflexivity and accountability during the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa.疫情应对中的信任技术:2014 - 2016年西非埃博拉疫情期间的开放性、反思性与问责制
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Feb 13;4(1):e001272. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001272. eCollection 2019.
2
Engaging 'communities': anthropological insights from the West African Ebola epidemic.融入“社区”:来自西非埃博拉疫情的人类学见解
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 May 26;372(1721). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0305.
3
Unintended consequences of the 'bushmeat ban' in West Africa during the 2013-2016 Ebola virus disease epidemic.2013-2016 年埃博拉病毒病疫情期间西非“丛林肉禁令”的意外后果。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;200:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Social Mobilization and Community Engagement Central to the Ebola Response in West Africa: Lessons for Future Public Health Emergencies.社会动员和社区参与是西非应对埃博拉疫情的核心:对未来公共卫生突发事件的启示。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):626-646. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00226. Print 2016 Dec 23.
5
The first mile: community experience of outbreak control during an Ebola outbreak in Luwero District, Uganda.第一英里:乌干达卢韦罗区埃博拉疫情期间疫情控制的社区经验。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 16;16:161. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2852-0.
6
Evaluating the frequency of operational research conducted during the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola epidemic.评估 2014-2016 年西非埃博拉疫情期间开展的运营研究的频率。
Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;77:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
7
Overview, Control Strategies, and Lessons Learned in the CDC Response to the 2014-2016 Ebola Epidemic.美国疾病控制与预防中心应对2014 - 2016年埃博拉疫情的概述、控制策略及经验教训
MMWR Suppl. 2016 Jul 8;65(3):4-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6503a2.
8
"We and the nurses are now working with one voice": How community leaders and health committee members describe their role in Sierra Leone's Ebola response.“我们和护士现在齐心协力”:社区领袖和卫生委员会成员讲述他们在塞拉利昂埃博拉应对行动中的角色。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2414-x.
9
'When Ebola enters a home, a family, a community': A qualitative study of population perspectives on Ebola control measures in rural and urban areas of Sierra Leone.当埃博拉进入家庭、家庭、社区时:塞拉利昂农村和城市地区人群对埃博拉控制措施的定性研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jun 8;12(6):e0006461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006461. eCollection 2018 Jun.
10
The Ebola epidemic and public health response.埃博拉疫情与公共卫生应对。
Br Med Bull. 2016 Mar;117(1):15-23. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw007.

引用本文的文献

1
PEARLES challenges and solutions to the implementation of clinical research responses to epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review.PEARLES:应对流行病和大流行的临床研究实施中的挑战与解决方案:一项范围综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 27;85:103294. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103294. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Responding to fluctuations in public and community trust and health seeking behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of national decision-makers' perspectives in Guinea and Sierra Leone.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间公众和社区信任度及寻医行为的波动:对几内亚和塞拉利昂国家决策者观点的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):2710. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20181-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ebola detectives race to identify hidden sources of infection as outbreak spreads.随着埃博拉疫情蔓延,埃博拉病毒调查人员竞相找出隐藏的感染源。
Nature. 2018 Dec;564(7735):174-175. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07618-0.
2
Prepared for the 'unexpected'? Lessons from the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa on integrating emergent theory designs into outbreak response.为“意外情况”做好准备?从2014 - 2016年西非埃博拉疫情中汲取的关于将应急理论设计融入疫情应对的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Aug 10;3(4):e000990. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000990. eCollection 2018.
3
Survivors' perceptions of public health messages during an Ebola crisis in Liberia and Sierra Leone: An exploratory study.
Conditions for health system resilience in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Mauritania.
应对 COVID-19 大流行背景下毛里塔尼亚卫生系统恢复力的条件。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Dec 2;8(12):e013943. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013943.
4
Evolving Face Mask Guidance During a Pandemic and Potential Harm to Public Perception: Infodemiology Study of Sentiment and Emotion on Twitter.大流行期间不断变化的口罩指南和对公众认知的潜在危害:Twitter 上情感的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 27;25:e40706. doi: 10.2196/40706.
5
Public health communication in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.加拿大在 COVID-19 大流行期间的公共卫生传播。
Can J Public Health. 2022 Dec;113(Suppl 1):34-45. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00702-z. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
Does pro-sociality or trust better predict staying home behavior during the Covid-19?在新冠疫情期间,亲社会行为或信任哪一个能更好地预测居家行为?
J Behav Exp Econ. 2022 Oct;100:101926. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2022.101926. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
7
Rapid development of a COVID-19 care planning decision-aid for family carers of people living with dementia.快速开发针对 COVID-19 护理计划的决策辅助工具,供照顾痴呆症患者的家庭护理人员使用。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1954-1966. doi: 10.1111/hex.13552. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
8
The Prevention Behaviors and Impact Mechanisms Among Different Chinese Social Classes at the Early Stage of COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情初期中国不同社会阶层的预防行为及影响机制
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Mar 20;15:711-723. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S345380. eCollection 2022.
9
Different roles of interpersonal trust and institutional trust in COVID-19 pandemic control.人际信任和制度信任在新冠疫情防控中的不同作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;293:114677. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114677. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
10
National health governance, science and the media: drivers of COVID-19 responses in Germany, Sweden and the UK in 2020.国家卫生治理、科学与媒体:2020 年德国、瑞典和英国应对 COVID-19 的驱动因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006691.
利比里亚和塞拉利昂埃博拉危机期间幸存者对公共卫生信息的认知:一项探索性研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2017 Dec;19(4):492-497. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12372. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Vaccination alone will not halt the next global pandemic.仅靠接种疫苗无法阻止下一次全球大流行。
BMJ. 2017 Jun 13;357:j2864. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2864.
5
Rethinking in the Bio-economy: Finance, Assetization, and the Management of Value.生物经济中的反思:金融、资产化与价值管理
Sci Technol Human Values. 2017 May;42(3):460-490. doi: 10.1177/0162243916661633. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
6
Assessments of Ebola knowledge, attitudes and practices in Forécariah, Guinea and Kambia, Sierra Leone, July-August 2015.2015年7月至8月在几内亚福雷卡里亚和塞拉利昂坎比亚对埃博拉知识、态度和行为的评估。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 May 26;372(1721). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0304.
7
Vaccination and blood sampling acceptability during Ramadan fasting month: A cross-sectional study in Conakry, Guinea.斋月禁食期间的疫苗接种和血液采样可接受性:在几内亚科纳克里的一项横断面研究
Vaccine. 2017 May 2;35(19):2569-2574. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.068.
8
Patient Satisfaction With Maternity Waiting Homes in Liberia: A Case Study During the Ebola Outbreak.利比里亚产妇候产之家的患者满意度:埃博拉疫情期间的案例研究
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Mar;62(2):163-171. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12600. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Comparison of social resistance to Ebola response in Sierra Leone and Guinea suggests explanations lie in political configurations not culture.对塞拉利昂和几内亚社会对埃博拉应对措施的抵制情况进行比较后发现,其原因在于政治格局而非文化。
Crit Public Health. 2017 Jan 1;27(1):14-27. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2016.1252034. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
10
How Does One "Open" Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research.如何“开放”科学?生物学研究中的价值问题。
Sci Technol Human Values. 2017 Mar;42(2):280-305. doi: 10.1177/0162243916672071. Epub 2016 Oct 4.