Tebbutt G M
J Hyg (Lond). 1986 Aug;97(1):81-90. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400064378.
Three groups of premises (butchers' shops, supermarkets and general dealers) which sell raw and cooked meats were compared. Salmonellas were not detected, but Escherichia coli, and to a lesser degree Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus faecalis, were widely distributed in all three groups of premises. Contamination of hands, towels and nail brushes was related to poor working practices. The presence of E. coli or Str. faecalis on slicing machines was associated with contamination of meat samples. A number of wiping cloths were heavily contaminated with E. coli, and many also contained Clostridium perfringens. Fewer premises provided written cleaning plans, and in many cases staff did not receive an adequate training in food hygiene. The use of disinfectants as part of the cleaning process did not necessarily reduce the level of bacterial contamination. In general there was poor correlation between microbiological results and a visual inspection made by an environmental health officer. The possible reasons for this finding are discussed.
对三组销售生肉和熟肉的经营场所(肉铺、超市和杂货商)进行了比较。未检测到沙门氏菌,但大肠杆菌以及程度较轻的金黄色葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌在所有三组经营场所中广泛分布。手部、毛巾和指甲刷的污染与不良工作习惯有关。切片机上存在大肠杆菌或粪肠球菌与肉样污染有关。一些抹布被大肠杆菌严重污染,许多抹布还含有产气荚膜梭菌。制定书面清洁计划的经营场所较少,而且在许多情况下,工作人员没有接受足够的食品卫生培训。在清洁过程中使用消毒剂不一定能降低细菌污染水平。总体而言,微生物检测结果与环境卫生官员的目视检查之间的相关性较差。讨论了这一发现的可能原因。