Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Division of Strategy, Management and Organization, Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Feb;116(2):296-312. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000176. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
Across 2 studies and 4 samples (Ns = 8,332, 2,136, 4,963, and 753, respectively), we tested whether the relation between conscientiousness and variables associated with important aspects of individuals' lives were curvilinear such that being high on conscientiousness was manifestly negative. Across multiple outcomes including measures of health, well-being, relationship satisfaction, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship, we found no evidence for a systematic curvilinear relation between conscientiousness and these outcomes. Furthermore, heeding the call to use more sophisticated psychometric modeling of the conscientiousness spectrum, we used different types of scale construction and scoring methods (i.e., dominance and ideal point) and again found no evidence of curvilinear relationships between conscientiousness and the aforementioned variables. We discuss the potential reasons for the inconsistency with past research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
在两项研究和四个样本中(N 值分别为 8332、2136、4963 和 753),我们测试了尽责性与个体生活重要方面相关变量之间的关系是否为曲线关系,即高度尽责性是否明显具有消极性。我们发现,在包括健康、幸福感、关系满意度、工作满意度和组织公民行为在内的多个结果上,尽责性与这些结果之间没有系统的曲线关系。此外,我们还根据谨慎的呼吁,使用了更复杂的尽责性谱的心理计量建模,我们使用了不同类型的量表构建和评分方法(即优势和理想点),但仍然没有发现尽责性与上述变量之间存在曲线关系的证据。我们讨论了与过去研究不一致的潜在原因。(APA,2019)