da Silva L C, Strauss E, Gayotto L C, Mies S, Macedo A L, da Silva A T, Silva E F, Lacet C M, Antonelli R H, Fermanian J
Ann Surg. 1986 Aug;204(2):148-53. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198608000-00008.
From 1977 to 1983, 94 patients with esophageal varices and gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to mansonic schistosomiasis were entered into a prospective randomized trial comparing the three operations mainly used in Brazil: esophagogastric devascularization associated with splenectomy (EGDS, 32 patients), classical splenorenal shunt (SRS, 32 patients), and distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS, 30 patients). The randomization was interrupted because of a significant incidence of portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) in the SRS group (26%), as compared to the DSRS (7%) and EGDS (0%) groups. The rate of rebleeding was the same in the three groups, but the rate of failure, as defined by the presence of technical problems, postoperative complications, or death, was significantly higher in the SRS group. This 2-year follow-up shows that SRS should be abandoned in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis and that a comparison between DSRS and EGDS with a longer follow-up is urgently needed.
1977年至1983年期间,94例患有曼氏血吸虫病继发食管静脉曲张和胃肠道出血的患者进入了一项前瞻性随机试验,该试验比较了巴西主要使用的三种手术:食管胃去血管化联合脾切除术(EGDS,32例患者)、经典脾肾分流术(SRS,32例患者)和远端脾肾分流术(DSRS,30例患者)。由于SRS组门体性脑病(PSE)的发生率显著高于DSRS组(7%)和EGDS组(0%)(26%),随机分组被中断。三组的再出血率相同,但SRS组因存在技术问题、术后并发症或死亡所定义的失败率显著更高。这项为期2年的随访表明,在肝脾血吸虫病中应放弃SRS,并且迫切需要对DSRS和EGDS进行更长时间随访的比较。