Suppr超能文献

从国际视角出发,采用归纳定性方法探究执业护师对领导力和研究的看法。

An inductive qualitative approach to explore Nurse Practitioners views on leadership and research: An international perspective.

机构信息

Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.

University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jul;28(13-14):2644-2658. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14853. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the ways in which Irish and Australian Nurse Practitioners (NPs) implement leadership and research in their roles and whether there is a difference in how leadership and research are demonstrated between NPs in Ireland and Australia.

BACKGROUND

The original concept of the NP role was to expand nursing practice in order to provide high-quality, accessible health care to patients. This placed NPs at the crux of changes to healthcare delivery. Implementing these changes requires leadership. Research demonstrates the effects of these changes to healthcare delivery and contributes to healthcare knowledge from the nursing profession.

DESIGN

In the qualitative phase of a mixed methods study, an interpretative descriptive approach was used to draw on participant experiences.

METHODS

Thirty-eight respondents agreed to be interviewed following an online survey. Ten interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke thematic analysis method. The research complied with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research, COREQ.

RESULTS

Ten participants, five NPs from Ireland and five from Australia were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the analysis: (a) Innovative leadership, which included the categories of leadership activities, the work of NPs and trailblazers; (b) Optimism, incorporating pride in achievements, the future outlook for the role and continued innovation of NPs over time; (c) Research, which included the NP research role, research challenges, support and research leadership; and (d) Resilience, which included overcoming resistance, isolation and seeking positive support systems.

CONCLUSION

Nurse Practitioners are clinical leaders focused on improving healthcare delivery for patient populations. There is a lack of understanding of the NP role. Nurse Practitioners lack confidence to be independently research active. Research by NPs requires support from nurses in academia. There is no difference in the role in Ireland and Australia.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurse Practitioners are engaged in healthcare transformation. Nurse Practitioners require support from research experts in academia to make a significant contribution to nursing knowledge in healthcare delivery.

摘要

目的和目标

探索爱尔兰和澳大利亚护士从业者(NPs)在其角色中实施领导力和研究的方式,以及爱尔兰和澳大利亚的 NPs 展示领导力和研究的方式是否存在差异。

背景

NP 角色的最初概念是扩大护理实践,以便为患者提供高质量、可及的医疗保健。这使 NPs 处于医疗保健提供方式变革的核心。实施这些变革需要领导力。研究表明这些变革对医疗保健提供的影响,并为护理专业的医疗保健知识做出贡献。

设计

在混合方法研究的定性阶段,采用解释性描述方法来借鉴参与者的经验。

方法

在在线调查后,有 38 名受访者同意接受采访。记录并逐字转录了 10 次访谈。使用 Braun 和 Clarke 主题分析方法分析数据。研究符合定性研究报告的综合标准,COREQ。

结果

分析得出 4 个主题:(a)创新领导力,包括领导活动、NPs 的工作和开拓者的类别;(b)乐观主义,包括对成就的自豪感、对角色的未来展望以及 NPs 随着时间的推移持续创新;(c)研究,包括 NP 的研究角色、研究挑战、支持和研究领导力;以及(d)韧性,包括克服阻力、孤立和寻求积极的支持系统。

结论

护士从业者是专注于改善患者群体医疗保健提供的临床领导者。对 NP 角色的理解不足。护士从业者缺乏独立开展研究的信心。NPs 的研究需要来自学术界护士的支持。爱尔兰和澳大利亚的角色没有区别。

临床实践相关性

护士从业者正在参与医疗保健转型。护士从业者需要得到学术界研究专家的支持,以便为医疗保健提供方面的护理知识做出重大贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验