Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;48(5):1701-1709. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz042.
Despite advances in life expectancy, low socioeconomic status is associated with a shorter lifespan. This study was conducted to investigate socioeconomic differences in mortality by comparing preventable with non-preventable causes of death in 39 506 participants from the Swedish Twin Registry born before 1935.
Childhood social class, own education, own social class and social mobility were used as separate indicators of socioeconomic status. These data were linked to the Swedish Cause of Death Register. Cause of death was categorized as preventable or non-preventable mortality according to indicators presented in the Avoidable Mortality in the European Union (AMIEHS) atlas. Using Cox proportional hazard models, we tested the association between the socioeconomic measures and all-cause mortality, preventable mortality and non-preventable mortality. Additional co-twin control analyses indicated whether the associations reflected genetic confounding.
The social gradient for mortality was most prominent for the adult socioeconomic measures. There was a social gradient in both preventable mortality and non-preventable mortality, but with an indication of a moderately stronger effect in preventable causes of death. In analyses of social mobility, those who experienced life-time low socioeconomic status (SES) or downward social mobility had an increased mortality risk compared with those with life-time high SES and upward social mobility. Adjustments for genetic confounding did not change the observed associations for education, social class or social mobility and mortality. In the co-twin control analyses of reared-apart twins, the association between childhood social class and mortality weakened, indicating possible genetic influences on this association.
Our results indicate that there is an association between low adult socioeconomic status and increased mortality independent of genetic endowment. Thus, we do not find support for indirect social selection as the basis for mortality inequalities in Sweden.
尽管预期寿命有所提高,但社会经济地位较低与寿命较短有关。本研究旨在通过比较瑞典双胞胎登记处 1935 年前出生的 39506 名参与者中可预防和不可预防的死亡原因,研究社会经济地位差异对死亡率的影响。
童年社会阶层、自身教育程度、自身社会阶层和社会流动被用作社会经济地位的单独指标。这些数据与瑞典死因登记处相关联。根据欧盟可避免死亡率(AMIEHS)图谱中提出的指标,死因被归类为可预防或不可预防的死亡率。使用 Cox 比例风险模型,我们测试了社会经济措施与全因死亡率、可预防死亡率和不可预防死亡率之间的关联。额外的同卵双胞胎对照分析表明,这些关联是否反映了遗传混杂。
在所有原因的死亡率方面,社会阶层的梯度在成年社会经济措施中最为明显。可预防死亡率和不可预防死亡率都存在社会梯度,但可预防死因的效应略强。在社会流动分析中,那些经历了一生低社会经济地位(SES)或向下社会流动的人比那些经历了一生高 SES 和向上社会流动的人有更高的死亡风险。遗传混杂的调整并没有改变观察到的教育、社会阶层或社会流动与死亡率之间的关联。在异卵双胞胎的对照分析中,童年社会阶层与死亡率之间的关联减弱,表明遗传因素可能对这种关联有影响。
我们的研究结果表明,低成人社会经济地位与死亡率增加之间存在关联,这种关联独立于遗传因素。因此,我们没有发现间接社会选择是瑞典死亡率不平等的基础的支持。