• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人口统计学的原发性全膝关节置换术尺寸计算器的前瞻性验证。

Prospective Validation of a Demographically Based Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Size Calculator.

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1369-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.048. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.048
PMID:30930159
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for streamlining operating room efficiency and reducing costs. Digital templating and patient-specific instrumentation have shown some value in TKA but require additional costs and resources. The purpose of this study was to validate a previously published algorithm that uses only demographic variables to accurately predict TKA tibial and femoral component sizes.

METHODS

Four hundred seventy-four consecutive patients undergoing elective primary TKA were prospectively enrolled. Four surgeons were included, three of which were unaffiliated with the retrospective cohort study. Patient sex, height, and weight were entered into our published Arthroplasty Size Prediction mobile application. Accuracy of the algorithm was compared with the actual sizes of the implanted femoral and tibial components from 5 different implant systems. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for inaccurate outliers for our model.

RESULTS

When assessing accuracy to within ±1 size, the accuracies of tibial and femoral components were 87% (412/474) and 76% (360/474). When assessing accuracy to within ±2 sizes of predicted, the tibial accuracy was 97% (461/474), and the femoral accuracy was 95% (450/474). Risk factors for the actual components falling outside of 2 predicted sizes include weight less than 70 kg (odds ratio = 2.47, 95% confidence interval [1.21-5.06], P = .01) and use of an implant system with <2.5 mm incremental changes between femoral sizes (odds ratio = 5.50, 95% confidence interval [3.33-9.11], P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective series of patients validates a simple algorithm to predict component sizing for TKA with high accuracy based on demographic variables alone. Surgeons can use this algorithm to simplify the preoperative planning process by reducing unnecessary trays, trials, and implant storage, particularly in the community or outpatient setting where resources are limited. Further assessment of components with less than 2.5-mm differences between femoral sizes is required in the future to make this algorithm more applicable worldwide.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术(TKA)的术前规划对于简化手术室效率和降低成本至关重要。数字模板和患者特异性器械在 TKA 中显示出一定的价值,但需要额外的成本和资源。本研究的目的是验证先前发表的一种算法,该算法仅使用人口统计学变量准确预测 TKA 胫骨和股骨组件的大小。

方法

前瞻性纳入 474 例接受择期初次 TKA 的连续患者。纳入 4 名外科医生,其中 3 名与回顾性队列研究无关。患者的性别、身高和体重被输入我们发表的关节置换尺寸预测移动应用程序。算法的准确性与来自 5 种不同植入物系统的植入股骨和胫骨组件的实际尺寸进行比较。使用多元回归分析确定我们模型中不准确离群值的独立危险因素。

结果

当评估±1 尺寸内的准确性时,胫骨和股骨组件的准确性分别为 87%(412/474)和 76%(360/474)。当评估预测±2 尺寸内的准确性时,胫骨的准确性为 97%(461/474),股骨的准确性为 95%(450/474)。实际组件尺寸超出 2 个预测尺寸的危险因素包括体重小于 70 公斤(优势比=2.47,95%置信区间[1.21-5.06],P=0.01)和使用股骨尺寸之间增量变化小于 2.5 毫米的植入物系统(优势比=5.50,95%置信区间[3.33-9.11],P<0.001)。

结论

本前瞻性患者系列验证了一种简单的算法,该算法基于人口统计学变量单独预测 TKA 组件的尺寸,具有很高的准确性。外科医生可以使用该算法通过减少不必要的托盘、试验和植入物存储来简化术前规划过程,特别是在资源有限的社区或门诊环境中。未来需要进一步评估股骨尺寸之间差异小于 2.5 毫米的组件,以使该算法在全球范围内更具适用性。

相似文献

1
Prospective Validation of a Demographically Based Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Size Calculator.基于人口统计学的原发性全膝关节置换术尺寸计算器的前瞻性验证。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1369-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.048. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
Can Demographic Variables Accurately Predict Component Sizing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?人口统计学变量能否准确预测初次全膝关节置换术中假体大小?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3004-3008. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 11.
3
Validation and performance of a machine-learning derived prediction guide for total knee arthroplasty component sizing.基于机器学习的全膝关节置换假体尺寸预测指南的验证和性能评估。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2235-2244. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04041-5. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
4
Accurately Predicting Total Knee Component Size without Preoperative Radiographs.无需术前X光片准确预测全膝关节假体尺寸
Surg Technol Int. 2018 Nov 11;33:337-342.
5
Preoperative CT-Based Three-Dimensional Templating in Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty More Accurately Predicts Implant Sizes than Two-Dimensional Templating.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中基于术前CT的三维模板比二维模板更准确地预测植入物尺寸。
J Knee Surg. 2019 Jul;32(7):642-648. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666829. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
Increased Accuracy in Templating for Total Knee Arthroplasty Using 3D Models Generated from Radiographs.利用 X 光片生成的 3D 模型提高全膝关节置换术模板的准确性。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Jul;36(8):837-842. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743496. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
7
Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the component size as used peroperative.用于全膝关节置换术的患者特定器械可以准确预测术中使用的组件尺寸。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3844-3848. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4345-1. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
8
Demographic data is more predictive of component size than digital radiographic templating in total knee arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术中,人口统计学数据比数字放射成像模板更能预测假体大小。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Nov 23;32(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00075-y.
9
Prospective Comparison of Available Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Sizing Equations.可用初次全膝关节置换术 sizing 方程的前瞻性比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1239-1246.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.041. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
10
Reliability of templating with patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中患者特异性器械模板的可靠性
J Knee Surg. 2013 Dec;26(6):429-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343615. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty using simple X-ray images.利用简单 X 射线图像预测全膝关节置换术中植入物大小的人工智能模型的开发。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 27;19(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05013-2.
2
Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Algorithms Versus Standard Linear Demographic Analysis in Predicting Implant Size of Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.人工智能机器学习算法与标准线性人口统计学分析在预测解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术中假体大小的比较。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 Aug 1;8(8). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00182.
3
Development and validation of multiple linear regression models for predicting total hip arthroplasty acetabular prosthesis.
开发和验证用于预测全髋关节置换髋臼假体的多元线性回归模型。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04526-0.
4
Magnification assessment of radiographs for knee replacement (MARKeR) - A pilot study in a low-resource setting.膝关节置换术X线片放大率评估(MARKeR)——低资源环境下的一项初步研究。
Acta Radiol Open. 2022 Apr 19;11(4):20584601221096297. doi: 10.1177/20584601221096297. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Accuracy of one-dimensional templating on linear EOS radiography allows template-directed instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.线性 EOS 射线照相术的一维模板的准确性允许在全膝关节置换术中进行模板引导的器械操作。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Nov 10;16(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02812-9.
6
Machine Learning Predicts Femoral and Tibial Implant Size Mismatch for Total Knee Arthroplasty.机器学习预测全膝关节置换术中股骨和胫骨植入物尺寸不匹配情况。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Feb 26;8:268-277.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.01.006. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Demographic data is more predictive of component size than digital radiographic templating in total knee arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术中,人口统计学数据比数字放射成像模板更能预测假体大小。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Nov 23;32(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00075-y.
8
Compilation and Analysis of Web-Based Orthopedic Personalized Predictive Tools: A Scoping Review.基于网络的骨科个性化预测工具的编制与分析:一项范围综述
J Pers Med. 2020 Nov 12;10(4):223. doi: 10.3390/jpm10040223.
9
Patient Demographics and Anthropometric Measurements Predict Tibial and Femoral Component Sizing in Total Knee Arthroplasty.患者人口统计学和人体测量学指标可预测全膝关节置换术中胫骨和股骨假体的尺寸。
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Nov 1;6(4):860-865. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.09.013. eCollection 2020 Dec.