Suppr超能文献

储存和DNA提取方法对日本成年人粪便微生物群16S rRNA分析的影响

Effect of storage and DNA extraction method on 16S rRNA-profiled fecal microbiota in Japanese adults.

作者信息

Kawada Yuki, Naito Yuji, Andoh Akira, Ozeki Motoyuki, Inoue Ryo

机构信息

Laboratory of Animal Science, Department of Agriculture and Life Science, Kyoto Prefectural University, 1-5 Hangi-cho, Shimogamo, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8522, Japan.

Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2019 Mar;64(2):106-111. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.18-84. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Abstract

The effect of two factors, storage and the bacterial DNA extraction method, that potentially affect the 16S rRNA-based profiling of the microbiota in the feces of Japanese adults, were evaluated. Profiles of the microbiota in feces stored in DESS (DMSO-EDTA-salt solution) for 1, 2 and 3 weeks at room temperature, and for 3 weeks at 4°C were compared with those in fresh feces and feces stored in guanidine thiocyanate solution for 3 weeks at 4°C. None of the storage variables (preservation solution, temperature and duration) considerably affected α- and β-diversity of the fecal microbiota and OTU profiles. Regarding the bacterial DNA extraction methods, four were evaluated; A) silica membrane DNA purification combined with bead-beating bacterial disruption, B) magnetic bead DNA purification combined with bead-beating bacterial disruption, C) manual DNA purification using phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitation combined with enzymatic bacterial lysis, and D) DNA extraction by a commercially available DNA stool kit. While methods A, B, and C did not markedly affect α- and β-diversity of the fecal microbiota and the OTU profiles, method D noticeably altered both α- and β-diversity. In addition, method D caused significant changes in the abundance of two predominant genera; and .

摘要

评估了储存和细菌DNA提取方法这两个可能影响日本成年人粪便中基于16S rRNA的微生物群分析的因素的作用。将在室温下于DESS(二甲基亚砜-乙二胺四乙酸-盐溶液)中储存1、2和3周以及在4°C下储存3周的粪便中的微生物群谱,与新鲜粪便以及在4°C下于硫氰酸胍溶液中储存3周的粪便中的微生物群谱进行比较。没有一个储存变量(保存溶液、温度和持续时间)对粪便微生物群的α和β多样性以及OTU谱有显著影响。关于细菌DNA提取方法,评估了四种方法;A)硅胶膜DNA纯化结合珠磨法破坏细菌,B)磁珠DNA纯化结合珠磨法破坏细菌,C)使用苯酚-氯仿和乙醇沉淀结合酶解细菌裂解的手动DNA纯化,以及D)通过市售的粪便DNA提取试剂盒进行DNA提取。虽然方法A、B和C对粪便微生物群的α和β多样性以及OTU谱没有明显影响,但方法D显著改变了α和β多样性。此外,方法D导致两个主要菌属的丰度发生了显著变化;以及。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/576d/6436037/1f64c3e17efb/jcbn18-84f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验