Suppr超能文献

脉冲与连续式 UVC-LED 照射杀菌效果比较。

Comparison of the performance of pulsed and continuous UVC-LED irradiation in the inactivation of bacteria.

机构信息

Department of Electronic Engineering, Laboratory of Micro/Nano-Optoelectronics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.

Department of Electronic Science, Fujian Engineering Research Center for Solid-State Lighting, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.

出版信息

Water Res. 2019 Jun 15;157:218-227. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.080. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

Abstract

Ultraviolet light-emitting diode (UV-LED) is a newly emerging UV light source with a potential to replace the conventional chemical methods, mercury UV lamps and xenon lamps in water disinfection. UV-LEDs are characterized by the diversity in wavelengths and can be turned on and off with a high and adjustable frequency, making them an attractive candidate for pulsed light (PL) disinfection apart from the conventional continuous wave (CW) operation. Previous studies on comparison between the PL and CW UV-LED irradiations for the inactivation of bacterium in water disinfection are limited and results conflict. In this work, PL and CW UV-LED in the C-spectral band (UVC-LED) irradiations were compared at equivalent fluence in the inactivation and subsequent photoreactivation of E. coli bacteria. In addition, effect of different driving currents and ambient temperatures on solder temperature of the PL and CW UVC-LED irradiation was also examined. Under the equivalent fluences, the PL and CW UVC-LED irradiations brought comparable inactivation efficiency and similar photoreactivation of the E. coli. Moreover, the PL UVC-LED exhibited a much lower solder temperature than the CW UVC-LED irradiation. On the other hand, CW UVC-LED irradiation, higher ambient temperature and higher driving current increased the solder temperature that resulted to a negative impact on the wavelength, full width at half maximum, optical power and irradiance, which are key factors in the UVC-LED disinfection efficiency. In all, this work reports the comparison between PL and CW in UVC-LED irradiation for inactivating E. coli bacteria and firstly revealed the photoreactivation of the E. coli after the PL UVC-LEDs irradiation.

摘要

紫外线发光二极管 (UV-LED) 是一种新兴的紫外线光源,具有取代传统化学方法、汞紫外线灯和氙灯在水消毒中应用的潜力。UV-LED 的特点是波长多样性,可以以高频率和可调频率开启和关闭,使其除了传统的连续波 (CW) 操作外,成为脉冲光 (PL) 消毒的一个有吸引力的选择。在水消毒中,PL 和 CW UV-LED 辐照对细菌灭活的比较研究之前是有限的,并且结果存在冲突。在这项工作中,在等效剂量下,比较了 C 波段 (UVC-LED) 的 PL 和 CW UV-LED 辐照对大肠杆菌的灭活和随后的光复活效果。此外,还研究了不同驱动电流和环境温度对 PL 和 CW UVC-LED 辐照中焊点温度的影响。在等效剂量下,PL 和 CW UVC-LED 辐照带来了相当的灭活效率和相似的大肠杆菌光复活效果。此外,PL UVC-LED 的焊点温度比 CW UVC-LED 辐照低得多。另一方面,CW UVC-LED 辐照、较高的环境温度和较高的驱动电流会增加焊点温度,从而对波长、半最大值全宽、光功率和辐照度产生负面影响,这些都是 UVC-LED 消毒效率的关键因素。总之,本工作报告了 PL 和 CW 在 UVC-LED 辐照灭活大肠杆菌中的比较,首次揭示了 PL UVC-LED 辐照后大肠杆菌的光复活现象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验