卧推练习中对传统组和超级组训练模式的力学与代谢反应
Mechanical and Metabolic Responses to Traditional and Cluster Set Configurations in the Bench Press Exercise.
作者信息
García-Ramos Amador, González-Hernández Jorge M, Baños-Pelegrín Ezequiel, Castaño-Zambudio Adrián, Capelo-Ramírez Fernando, Boullosa Daniel, Haff G Gregory, Jiménez-Reyes Pedro
机构信息
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Faculty of Education, Catholic University of the Most Holy Conception, Concepción, Chile.
出版信息
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Mar;34(3):663-670. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002301.
García-Ramos, A, González-Hernández, JM, Baños-Pelegrín, E, Castaño-Zambudio, A, Capelo-Ramírez, F, Boullosa, D, Haff, GG, and Jiménez-Reyes, P. Mechanical and metabolic responses to traditional and cluster set configurations in the bench press exercise. J Strength Cond Res 34(3): 663-670, 2020-This study aimed to compare mechanical and metabolic responses between traditional (TR) and cluster (CL) set configurations in the bench press exercise. In a counterbalanced randomized order, 10 men were tested with the following protocols (sets × repetitions [inter-repetition rest]): TR1: 3 × 10 (0-second), TR2: 6 × 5 (0-second), CL5: 3 × 10 (5-second), CL10: 3 × 10 (10-second), and CL15: 3 × 10 (15-second). The number of repetitions (30), interset rest (5 minutes), and resistance applied (10 repetition maximum) were the same for all set configurations. Movement velocity and blood lactate concentration were used to assess the mechanical and metabolic responses, respectively. The comparison of the first and last set of the training session revealed a significant decrease in movement velocity for TR1 (Effect size [ES]: -0.92), CL10 (ES: -0.85), and CL15 (ES: -1.08) (but not for TR2 [ES: -0.38] and CL5 [ES: -0.37]); while blood lactate concentration was significantly increased for TR1 (ES: 1.11), TR2 (ES: 0.90), and CL5 (ES: 1.12) (but not for CL10 [ES: 0.03] and CL15 [ES: -0.43]). Based on velocity loss, set configurations were ranked as follows: TR1 (-39.3 ± 7.3%) > CL5 (-20.2 ± 14.7%) > CL10 (-12.9 ± 4.9%), TR2 (-10.3 ± 5.3%), and CL15 (-10.0 ± 2.3%). The set configurations were ranked as follows based on the lactate concentration: TR1 (7.9 ± 1.1 mmol·L) > CL5 (5.8 ± 0.9 mmol·L) > TR2 (4.2 ± 0.7 mmol·L) > CL10 (3.5 ± 0.4 mmol·L) and CL15 (3.4 ± 0.7 mmol·L). These results support the use of TR2, CL10, and CL15 for the maintenance of high mechanical outputs, while CL10 and CL15 produce less metabolic stress than TR2.
加西亚 - 拉莫斯，A；冈萨雷斯 - 埃尔南德斯，JM；巴尼奥斯 - 佩莱格林，E；卡斯塔尼奥 - 赞布迪奥，A；卡佩洛 - 拉米雷斯，F；布约洛萨，D；哈夫，GG；希门尼斯 - 雷耶斯，P。卧推训练中传统与成组训练模式的机械和代谢反应。《力量与体能研究杂志》34(3)：663 - 670，2020年。本研究旨在比较卧推训练中传统（TR）和成组（CL）训练模式的机械和代谢反应。10名男性按照平衡随机顺序接受以下训练方案测试（组数×重复次数[组内重复休息时间]）：TR1：3×10（0秒），TR2：6×5（0秒），CL5：3×10（5秒），CL10：3×10（10秒），CL15：3×10（15秒）。所有训练模式的重复次数（30次）、组间休息（5分钟）和施加的阻力（10次重复最大值）均相同。分别使用运动速度和血乳酸浓度评估机械和代谢反应。训练课第一组和最后一组的比较显示，TR1（效应量[ES]： - 0.92）、CL10（ES： - 0.85）和CL15（ES： - 1.08）的运动速度显著下降（TR2[ES： - 0.38]和CL5[ES： - 0.37]未出现显著下降）；而TR1（ES：1.11）、TR2（ES：0.90）和CL5（ES：1.12）的血乳酸浓度显著升高（CL10[ES：0.03]和CL15[ES： - 0.43]未出现显著升高）。基于速度损失，训练模式排序如下：TR1（ - 39.3 ± 7.3%）> CL5（ - 20.2 ± 14.7%）> CL10（ - 12.9 ± 4.9%），TR2（ - 10.3 ± 5.3%），CL15（ - 10.0 ± 2.3%）。基于乳酸浓度，训练模式排序如下：TR1（7.9 ± 1.1 mmol·L）> CL5（5.8 ± 0.9 mmol·L）> TR2（4.2 ± 0.7 mmol·L）> CL10（3.5 ± 0.4 mmol·L）和CL15（3.4 ± 0.7 mmol·L）。这些结果支持使用TR2、CL10和CL15来维持较高的机械输出，而CL10和CL15产生的代谢压力比TR2小。
Zotero 插件