Phillips Bob, Depani Sarita, Morgan Jess
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Leeds, UK.
Regional Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Leeds Childrens Hospital, Leeds, UK.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Mar 1;3(1):e000398. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000398. eCollection 2019.
This study reports how parents and young people who had an experience offebrile neutropenia (FN) improved the design of a trial to inform the management of this condition. Five parents, a young person who had completed treatment and three clinician-researchers contributed.
The group was formed after an invitation on social media and met via video conference. Many participants were from an existing childhood-cancer parent-involvement group. The initial questions asked during discussion were about the importance of the topic, the views on the need for a trial, which important outcomes should be measured and the practical aspects which would make it easier or more difficult for people to take part in it. The conversation occurred for an entire afternoon, was audio and video recorded, transcribed, analysed and checked by those involved. The fifth parent added to this via email.
The group altered the trial structure by proposing randomising of each child to one of the two management methods through the whole of their anti-cancer treatment, rather than randomising the study sites or the child at each visit. They felt that even if people declined taking part in the study in the first weeks of diagnosis, their views might change and they should be allowed to consent later. They also proposed methods of collecting important patient and family data, enriching the medical information gained in the study. Active follow-up, negotiated for each individual family, was also suggested.
Trials for improving the management of FN in children and young people who are undergoing anti-cancer treatments should consider individual-patient randomisation, collection of 'quality of life' and 'experience of care' aspects using digital and paper-based methods, engage families in shared decision-making about management options and ensure adequate supportive information is available and accessible to all patients regardless of background, geographical location or age.
本研究报告了有发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)经历的父母和年轻人如何改进一项试验的设计,以指导这种病症的管理。五名父母、一名已完成治疗的年轻人和三名临床研究人员参与其中。
该小组是在社交媒体上发出邀请后组建的,并通过视频会议进行会面。许多参与者来自现有的儿童癌症家长参与小组。讨论中最初提出的问题包括该主题的重要性、对进行试验必要性的看法、应测量哪些重要结果以及哪些实际因素会使人们更容易或更难参与试验。对话持续了整个下午,进行了音频和视频录制,由相关人员进行转录、分析和核对。第五位家长通过电子邮件补充了相关内容。
该小组改变了试验结构,提议在整个抗癌治疗过程中将每个孩子随机分配到两种管理方法中的一种,而不是在每次就诊时对研究地点或孩子进行随机分组。他们认为,即使人们在诊断后的头几周拒绝参与研究,他们的观点可能会改变,应该允许他们稍后再同意参与。他们还提出了收集重要患者和家庭数据的方法,丰富了研究中获得的医学信息。还建议为每个家庭协商进行积极的随访。
针对正在接受抗癌治疗的儿童和年轻人改善FN管理的试验应考虑个体患者随机分组,使用数字和纸质方法收集“生活质量”和“护理体验”方面的信息,让家庭参与关于管理方案的共同决策,并确保所有患者无论背景、地理位置或年龄如何,都能获得并获取足够的支持性信息。