• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者对绿色建筑评级的看法:以印度尼西亚为例的研究

Stakeholders' perspectives on green building rating: A case study in Indonesia.

作者信息

Berawi Mohammed Ali, Miraj Perdana, Windrayani Retno, Berawi Abdur Rohim Boy

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424 Indonesia.

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Pancasila, DKI Jakarta, 12640 Indonesia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2019 Mar 20;5(3):e01328. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01328. eCollection 2019 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01328
PMID:30957036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6431742/
Abstract

Green building rating system has been used by many countries around the globe to certify the green buildings. However, little evidence has confirmed that stakeholders understand the theory and practical implementation of green building rating system, particularly in Indonesia. Thus, the paper aims to evaluate stakeholders knowledge of green buildings, and to propose recommendation for green building direction for the government. The result shows most of the professionals in this sector prefer considering environmental issues as the primary concern in developing the new building over social and economic aspects of sustainability. Despite their awareness of this concept, limited experience from building owner and rewards are the two main barriers to the steady progress of professionals taking certification of green building. This study also shows that the government and green building council of the country needs to evaluate the method to promote the use of green building concept and to encourage professionals taking the certification.

摘要

全球许多国家都采用了绿色建筑评级系统来认证绿色建筑。然而,几乎没有证据表明利益相关者了解绿色建筑评级系统的理论和实际应用,尤其是在印度尼西亚。因此,本文旨在评估利益相关者对绿色建筑的了解程度,并为政府提出绿色建筑发展方向的建议。结果表明,该领域的大多数专业人士在开发新建筑时更倾向于将环境问题作为首要关注点,而非可持续性的社会和经济方面。尽管他们了解这一概念,但建筑业主的经验有限和缺乏奖励是专业人士稳步推进绿色建筑认证的两个主要障碍。这项研究还表明,该国政府和绿色建筑委员会需要评估推广绿色建筑概念使用的方法,并鼓励专业人士进行认证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ea4/6431742/9bda3620b146/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ea4/6431742/2291bfe5e199/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ea4/6431742/5284f513ca07/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ea4/6431742/9bda3620b146/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ea4/6431742/2291bfe5e199/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ea4/6431742/5284f513ca07/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ea4/6431742/9bda3620b146/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Stakeholders' perspectives on green building rating: A case study in Indonesia.利益相关者对绿色建筑评级的看法:以印度尼西亚为例的研究
Heliyon. 2019 Mar 20;5(3):e01328. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01328. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Examining Green Star certification uptake and its relationship with Building Information Modelling (BIM) adoption in New Zealand.审查新西兰绿色之星认证的采用情况及其与建筑信息模型(BIM)采用的关系。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Nov 15;250:109508. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109508. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
3
Green Building Rating Systems from the prospect of sustainability dimensions through the building lifecycle.绿色建筑评价体系从可持续性维度的角度贯穿建筑物的全生命周期。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):51054-51064. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16682-5. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
4
Social Network Analysis of Factors Influencing Green Building Development in China.中国绿色建筑发展影响因素的社会网络分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 28;15(12):2684. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122684.
5
China Act on the Energy Efficiency of Civil Buildings (2008): A decade review.《中华人民共和国民用建筑节能条例(2008 年)》:十年回顾。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 1):42-60. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.118. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
6
A comprehensive review on green buildings research: bibliometric analysis during 1998-2018.绿色建筑研究的全面综述:1998-2018 年的文献计量分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(34):46196-46214. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12739-7. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
7
Developing a Green Building Assessment Tool for Ethiopia.为埃塞俄比亚开发一个绿色建筑评估工具。
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 13;8(9):e10569. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10569. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Strategic Behavior in Certifying Green Buildings: An Inquiry of the Non-building Performance Value.绿色建筑认证中的战略行为:对非建筑性能价值的探究
Environ Manage. 2017 Aug;60(2):231-242. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0869-5. Epub 2017 May 3.
9
Land management criteria for green building certification systems in Turkey.土耳其绿色建筑认证系统的土地管理标准。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(24):35442-35454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33591-5. Epub 2024 May 10.
10
Assessment method for new sustainability indicators providing pandemic resilience for residential buildings.为住宅建筑提供大流行恢复力的新可持续性指标评估方法。
MethodsX. 2021 Nov 9;8:101577. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101577. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel index to predict the cost of green resilient buildings.一种预测绿色韧性建筑成本的新指标。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 29;11(1):e40825. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40825. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
2
Blockchain for SME Clusters: An Ideation using the Framework of Ostrom Commons Governance.面向中小企业集群的区块链:基于奥斯特罗姆公地治理框架的构思
Inf Syst Front. 2022;24(4):1125-1143. doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10288-z. Epub 2022 May 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C.《巴黎协定》气候提案需要进一步推动,才能将升温控制在 2°C 以下。
Nature. 2016 Jun 30;534(7609):631-9. doi: 10.1038/nature18307.
2
Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools.可持续建设——环境评估工具的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2008 Feb;86(3):451-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
3
"Power quality system," a new system of quality management for globalization: towards innovation and competitive advantages.
“电能质量系统”,一种面向全球化的质量管理新体系:迈向创新与竞争优势。
Qual Assur. 2001;9(1):5-30. doi: 10.1080/713843985.