Crum Raphael J, de Sa Darren, Kanakamedala Ajay C, Obioha Obianuju A, Lesniak Bryson P, Musahl Volker
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster Children's Hospital, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Knee Surg. 2020 Jul;33(7):704-721. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685160. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
This review is aimed to compare suspensory and aperture quadriceps tendon autograft femoral and tibial fixations in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), and the clinical outcomes and complication profiles of each fixation method. Greater understanding of the optimal graft fixation technique for quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts may assist surgeons in improving outcomes after ACL-R. PubMed, Embase, and Medline were searched from database inception to September 2017, and again to July 2018, and identified 3,670 articles, 21 studies of which satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria. Across included studies, 1,155 QT ACL-R patients (mean age, 28.7 years [range, 15-59 years], with mean postoperative follow-up of 36.1 months [range, 3.4-120 months]), were analyzed. Suspensory fixation on both sides demonstrated a higher percentage of patients (81.7%) achieving the highest rating of "A or B" on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee ligament examination form compared with aperture fixation on both sides (67.7%). Moreover, suspensory fixation had a lower side-to-side difference in anterior laxity (1.6 mm) when compared with aperture fixation (2.3 mm). Among studies which reported graft failure, all of which employed aperture fixation, the rate was 3.2%. Across available data, primary ACL-R using QT grafts appears to have successful short-term outcomes with a short-term graft failure rate of 3% independent of fixation method. While there is limited data regarding the comparison of aperture and suspensory soft-tissue quadriceps tendon (SQT) fixation in ACL-R, the findings of this systematic review suggest that suspensory fixation and aperture fixation in both the femoral and tibial tunnels are equally efficacious based on clinical outcome data on IKDC grade and measured laxity. This is a level IV, systematic review study.
本综述旨在比较初次前交叉韧带重建(ACL-R)中悬吊式和骨隧道式股四头肌肌腱自体移植的股骨和胫骨固定方式,以及每种固定方法的临床疗效和并发症情况。深入了解股四头肌肌腱(QT)自体移植的最佳固定技术,可能有助于外科医生改善ACL-R后的治疗效果。检索了PubMed、Embase和Medline数据库,时间跨度从建库至2017年9月,后又更新至2018年7月,共识别出3670篇文章,其中21项研究符合纳入/排除标准。纳入研究的对象为1155例接受QT ACL-R的患者(平均年龄28.7岁[范围15 - 59岁],术后平均随访36.1个月[范围3.4 - 120个月])。双侧悬吊式固定的患者在国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)膝关节韧带检查表格中获得“A或B”最高评级的比例(81.7%)高于双侧骨隧道式固定(67.7%)。此外,与骨隧道式固定(2.3mm)相比,悬吊式固定的前向松弛度的侧方差异较小(1.6mm)。在报告移植物失败的研究中,均采用骨隧道式固定,失败率为3.2%。根据现有数据,使用QT移植物进行初次ACL-R似乎具有成功的短期疗效,短期移植物失败率为3%,与固定方法无关。虽然关于ACL-R中骨隧道式和悬吊式软组织股四头肌肌腱(SQT)固定比较的数据有限,但本系统综述的结果表明,基于IKDC分级和测量的松弛度的临床结果数据,股骨和胫骨隧道中的悬吊式固定和骨隧道式固定同样有效。这是一项IV级系统综述研究。