Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Aug;21(8):953-961. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage is a potentially lethal complication after pancreatic resection. The objective of this systematic review is to provide insight in the current status of incidence, detection, management and clinical outcomes of late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage.
A systematic search was conducted on the literature from February 2007 to July 2018 in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library. Included were clinical studies with clinical outcomes on late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage defined according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition (i.e. occurring >24 h after pancreatic resection).
A total of 14 studies on 467 patients with late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage were included. The incidence of late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage ranged from 3% to 16% (weighted mean: 5%). Seventy-four patients received conservative treatment; 252 patients underwent primary endovascular intervention; 82 patients underwent primary relaparotomy; 56 patients underwent primary endoscopic intervention; and three patients died before any intervention could be performed. CT-scan and diagnostic angiography were able to identify the source of hemorrhage in 67% (66/98) and 69% (114/166) of patients, respectively. The most frequent origin of the hemorrhage was the gastroduodenal artery stump (79/275; 29%), followed by the common hepatic artery (51/275; 19%) and splenic artery (32/275; 12%). Overall mortality was 21% (98/464 patients; range 0%-38%). Mortality was lower after primary interventional angiography as compared to primary relaparotomy (16% vs 37% respectively).
This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the current literature for severe late postpancreatectomy hemorrhages. CT-scan and diagnostic angiography are equally sensitive in detecting the bleeding source. Interventional angiography appears to be associated to lower mortality as compared to relaparotomy and endoscopy as first intervention for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage.
胰切除术后出血是一种潜在的致命并发症。本系统综述的目的是提供对目前胰切除术后迟发性出血发生率、检测、处理和临床结果的了解。
对 2007 年 2 月至 2018 年 7 月在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中有关胰切除术后迟发性出血的临床研究进行了系统检索。纳入的研究为根据国际胰腺外科研究组的定义(即发生在胰腺切除术后>24 小时后)报告了迟发性胰切除术后出血的临床结局的临床研究。
共纳入了 14 项关于 467 例迟发性胰切除术后出血患者的研究。迟发性胰切除术后出血的发生率为 3%至 16%(加权均值:5%)。74 例患者接受保守治疗;252 例患者接受了原发性血管内介入治疗;82 例患者接受了原发性再次剖腹手术;56 例患者接受了原发性内镜介入治疗;3 例患者在任何干预措施之前死亡。CT 扫描和诊断性血管造影术分别能够确定 67%(66/98)和 69%(114/166)的患者的出血源。出血最常见的来源是胃十二指肠动脉残端(79/275;29%),其次是肝总动脉(51/275;19%)和脾动脉(32/275;12%)。总体死亡率为 21%(98/464 例患者;范围 0%-38%)。与原发性再次剖腹手术相比,原发性介入性血管造影术后的死亡率较低(分别为 16%和 37%)。
本系统综述提供了对目前关于严重胰切除术后迟发性出血的文献的全面概述。CT 扫描和诊断性血管造影术在检测出血源方面同样敏感。与再次剖腹手术和内镜治疗相比,介入性血管造影术似乎与较低的死亡率相关,是胰切除术后出血的首选治疗方法。