Birnbaum David Jérémie, Bertucci François, Finetti Pascal, Birnbaum Daniel, Mamessier Emilie
Laboratoire Oncologie Prédictive, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, INSERM UMR1068, CNRS UMR725, Aix-Marseille Université, 13273 Marseille, France.
Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 13385 Marseille, France.
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Apr 8;11(4):497. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040497.
The association between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) location (head vs. Body/Tail (B/T)) and clinical outcome remains controversial. We collected clinicopathological and gene expression data from 249 resected PDAC samples from public data sets, and we compared data between 208 head and 41 B/T samples. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was better for the head than for the B/T PDACs (44 vs. 27%, = 0.043), especially when comparing tumors with similar TNM classification (T3/4N0M0: 67% vs. 17%, = 0.002) or from the same molecular class (squamous subtype: 31% vs. 0%, < 0.0001). Bailey's molecular subtypes were differentially distributed within the two groups, with the immunogenic subtype being underrepresented in the "B/T" group ( = 0.005). Uni- and multivariate analyses indicated that PDAC anatomic location was an independent prognostic factor. Finally, the supervised analysis identified 334 genes differentially expressed. Genes upregulated in the "head" group suggested lymphocyte activation and pancreas exocrine functions. Genes upregulated in the "B/T" group were related to keratinocyte differentiation, in line with the enrichment for squamous phenotype. We identified a robust gene expression signature (GES) associated with B/T PDAC location, suggesting that head and B/T PDAC are different. This GES could serve as an indicator for differential therapeutic management based on PDAC location.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的位置(胰头与胰体/胰尾(B/T))与临床结局之间的关联仍存在争议。我们从公共数据集中收集了249例切除的PDAC样本的临床病理和基因表达数据,并比较了208例胰头样本和41例B/T样本的数据。胰头PDAC的2年总生存率(OS)优于B/T PDAC(44%对27%,P = 0.043),特别是在比较具有相似TNM分类的肿瘤时(T3/4N0M0:67%对17%,P = 0.002)或来自相同分子类别的肿瘤时(鳞状亚型:31%对0%,P < 0.0001)。贝利分子亚型在两组中的分布存在差异,免疫原性亚型在“B/T”组中代表性不足(P = 0.005)。单因素和多因素分析表明,PDAC的解剖位置是一个独立的预后因素。最后,监督分析确定了334个差异表达基因。在“胰头”组中上调的基因提示淋巴细胞活化和胰腺外分泌功能。在“B/T”组中上调的基因与角质形成细胞分化有关,这与鳞状表型的富集一致。我们确定了一个与B/T PDAC位置相关的强大基因表达特征(GES),表明胰头和B/T PDAC是不同的。这个GES可以作为基于PDAC位置进行差异化治疗管理的指标。