Suppr超能文献

与合成大麻素使用相关的精神病理学症状:与天然大麻的比较。

Psychopathological symptoms associated with synthetic cannabinoid use: a comparison with natural cannabis.

机构信息

Department of Drug Monitoring, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Psychiatry, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Sep;236(9):2677-2685. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05238-8. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are a class of new psychoactive substances that have been rapidly evolving around the world throughout recent years. Many different synthetic cannabinoid analogues are on the consumer market and sold under misleading names, like "spice" or "incense." A limited number of studies have reported serious health effects associated with SC use. In this study, we compared clinical and subclinical psychopathological symptoms associated with SC use and natural cannabis (NC) use.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 367 NC and SC users was recruited online, including four validated psychometric questionnaires: The Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Altman Mania Scale (Altman), and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The two groups were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and covariance (ANCOVA), chi tests, and logistic regression when appropriate.

RESULTS

The SC user group did not differ in age from the NC user group (27.7 years), but contained less females (21% and 30%, respectively). SC users scored higher than NC users on all used psychometric measures, indicating a higher likelihood of drug abuse, sleep problems, (hypo)manic symptoms, and the nine dimensions comprising the BSI, somatization, obsessive-compulsive behavior, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. Odds ratios (95% CI) for the SC user group vs NC user group were, respectively, drug dependence 3.56 (1.77-7.16), (severe) insomnia 5.01 (2.10-11.92), (hypo-)mania 5.18 (2.04-13.14), and BSI psychopathology 5.21 (2.96-9.17).

DISCUSSION

This study shows that SC use is associated with increased mental health symptomatology compared to NC use.

摘要

背景

合成大麻素(SCs)是近年来在全球范围内迅速发展的一类新型精神活性物质。许多不同的合成大麻素类似物在消费者市场上以误导性的名称出售,如“香料”或“香薰”。有限的研究报告了与 SC 使用相关的严重健康影响。在这项研究中,我们比较了与 SC 使用和天然大麻(NC)使用相关的临床和亚临床心理病理症状。

方法

我们在线招募了 367 名 NC 和 SC 用户的便利样本,包括四个经过验证的心理计量学问卷:药物使用障碍识别测试(DUDIT)、失眠严重程度指数(ISI)、阿尔特曼躁狂量表(Altman)和简明症状量表(BSI)。当适当的时候,我们使用方差分析(ANOVA)和协方差分析(ANCOVA)、卡方检验和逻辑回归对两组进行比较。

结果

SC 用户组在年龄上与 NC 用户组没有差异(27.7 岁),但女性比例较低(分别为 21%和 30%)。SC 用户在所有使用的心理计量学测量上的得分均高于 NC 用户,这表明他们更有可能滥用药物、出现睡眠问题、(轻躁狂)症状和 BSI 的九个维度,包括躯体化、强迫行为、人际敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌意、恐怖症、偏执观念和精神病。SC 用户组与 NC 用户组相比,药物依赖的比值比(95%置信区间)分别为 3.56(1.77-7.16)、(严重)失眠 5.01(2.10-11.92)、(轻躁狂) 5.18(2.04-13.14)和 BSI 精神病理学 5.21(2.96-9.17)。

讨论

与 NC 使用相比,SC 使用与增加的心理健康症状相关。

相似文献

5
Do police arrestees substitute legal highs for other drugs?被警方逮捕的人会用新型毒品替代其他毒品吗?
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 May;31:74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
Synthetic cannabinoid use among college students.大学生合成大麻素使用情况。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jun;93:219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

2
Cannabis and psychopathology: 2024 Snapshot of a meandering journey.大麻与精神病理学:2024年曲折历程概览
Indian J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;67(3):283-302. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_968_24. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
7
9
New psychoactive substances: a review and updates.新型精神活性物质:综述与更新
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020 Dec 17;10:2045125320967197. doi: 10.1177/2045125320967197. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Cannabinoid Ligands Targeting TRP Channels.靶向瞬时受体电位通道的大麻素配体
Front Mol Neurosci. 2019 Jan 15;11:487. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00487. eCollection 2018.
2
Therapeutic Use of Synthetic Cannabinoids: Still an OpenIssue?合成大麻素的治疗用途:仍是一个未决问题?
Clin Ther. 2018 Sep;40(9):1457-1466. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
5
6
Health Risk Behaviors With Synthetic Cannabinoids Versus Marijuana.合成大麻素与大麻的健康风险行为
Pediatrics. 2017 Apr;139(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2675. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验