• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NeSt1 蛋白通过激活中性粒细胞增强寨卡病毒发病机制。

NeSt1 Protein Enhances Zika Virus Pathogenesis by Activating Neutrophils.

机构信息

Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

出版信息

J Virol. 2019 Jun 14;93(13). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00395-19. Print 2019 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1128/JVI.00395-19
PMID:30971475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6580965/
Abstract

Saliva from the mosquito vector of flaviviruses is capable of changing the local immune environment, leading to an increase in flavivirus-susceptible cells at the infected bite site. In addition, an antibody response to specific salivary gland (SG) components changes the pathogenesis of flaviviruses in human populations. To investigate whether antigenic SG proteins are capable of enhancing infection with Zika virus (ZIKV), a reemerging flavivirus primarily transmitted by the mosquito, we screened for antigenic SG proteins using a yeast display library and demonstrate that a previously undescribed SG protein we term neutrophil stimulating factor 1 (NeSt1) activates primary mouse neutrophils Passive immunization against NeSt1 decreases pro-interleukin-1β and CXCL2 expression, prevents macrophages from infiltrating the bite site, protects susceptible IFNAR IFNGR (AG129) mice from early ZIKV replication, and ameliorates virus-induced pathogenesis. These findings indicate that NeSt1 stimulates neutrophils at the mosquito bite site to change the immune microenvironment, allowing a higher level of early viral replication and enhancing ZIKV pathogenesis. When a Zika virus-infected mosquito bites a person, mosquito saliva is injected into the skin along with the virus. Molecules in this saliva can make virus infection more severe by changing the immune system to make the skin a better place for the virus to replicate. We identified a molecule that activates immune cells, called neutrophils, to recruit other immune cells, called macrophages, that the virus can infect. We named this molecule neutrophil-stimulating factor 1 (NeSt1). When we used antibodies to block NeSt1 in mice and then allowed Zika virus-infected mosquitoes to feed on these mice, they survived much better than mice that do not have antibodies against NeSt1. These findings give us more information about how mosquito saliva enhances virus infection, and it is possible that a vaccine against NeSt1 might protect people against severe Zika virus infection.

摘要

登革热病毒的蚊媒唾液能够改变局部免疫环境,导致感染部位对黄病毒更易感的细胞增加。此外,针对特定唾液腺 (SG) 成分的抗体反应改变了黄病毒在人类中的发病机制。为了研究抗原性 SG 蛋白是否能够增强寨卡病毒 (ZIKV) 的感染,一种主要由蚊子传播的新兴黄病毒,我们使用酵母展示文库筛选抗原性 SG 蛋白,并证明一种以前未描述的 SG 蛋白,我们称之为中性粒细胞刺激因子 1 (NeSt1),能够激活原代小鼠中性粒细胞。针对 NeSt1 的被动免疫可降低促白细胞介素-1β和 CXCL2 的表达,阻止巨噬细胞浸润感染部位,保护易感 IFNAR IFNGR (AG129) 小鼠免受早期 ZIKV 复制的影响,并改善病毒引起的发病机制。这些发现表明,NeSt1 刺激蚊子叮咬部位的中性粒细胞改变免疫微环境,允许更高水平的早期病毒复制并增强 ZIKV 发病机制。当感染寨卡病毒的蚊子叮咬人时,蚊子唾液会与病毒一起注入皮肤。这种唾液中的分子可以通过改变免疫系统使皮肤成为病毒更易复制的地方,从而使病毒感染更加严重。我们鉴定了一种能够激活免疫细胞(称为中性粒细胞)的分子,以招募其他免疫细胞(称为巨噬细胞),病毒可以感染这些细胞。我们将这种分子命名为中性粒细胞刺激因子 1 (NeSt1)。当我们使用抗体阻断 NeSt1 后,让感染寨卡病毒的蚊子叮咬这些老鼠时,它们的存活情况明显好于没有针对 NeSt1 的抗体的老鼠。这些发现为我们提供了更多关于蚊子唾液如何增强病毒感染的信息,并且针对 NeSt1 的疫苗可能可以保护人们免受严重的寨卡病毒感染。

相似文献

1
NeSt1 Protein Enhances Zika Virus Pathogenesis by Activating Neutrophils.NeSt1 蛋白通过激活中性粒细胞增强寨卡病毒发病机制。
J Virol. 2019 Jun 14;93(13). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00395-19. Print 2019 Jul 1.
2
Subgenomic flavivirus RNA binds the mosquito DEAD/H-box helicase ME31B and determines Zika virus transmission by .亚基因组黄病毒 RNA 结合蚊子 DEAD/H-box 解旋酶 ME31B,并通过......决定寨卡病毒的传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 17;116(38):19136-19144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905617116. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
3
AgBR1 and NeSt1 antisera protect mice from Aedes aegypti-borne Zika infection.抗AgBR1和抗NeSt1血清可保护小鼠免受埃及伊蚊传播的寨卡病毒感染。
Vaccine. 2021 Mar 19;39(12):1675-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.072. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
4
Aedes aegypti AgBR1 antibodies modulate early Zika virus infection of mice.埃及伊蚊 AgBR1 抗体可调节小鼠早期寨卡病毒感染。
Nat Microbiol. 2019 Jun;4(6):948-955. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0385-x. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
5
Zika virus transmission to mouse ear by mosquito bite: a laboratory model that replicates the natural transmission process.寨卡病毒通过蚊虫叮咬传播至小鼠耳部:一种模拟自然传播过程的实验室模型。
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jul 20;10(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2286-2.
6
The human CD47 checkpoint is targeted by an immunosuppressive salivary factor to enhance arboviral skin infectivity.一种免疫抑制性唾液因子靶向作用于人类 CD47 检查点,以增强虫媒病毒的皮肤感染力。
Sci Immunol. 2024 Aug 9;9(98):eadk9872. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.adk9872.
7
Microbial Composition in Larval Water Enhances Aedes aegypti Development but Reduces Transmissibility of Zika Virus.幼虫水中的微生物组成可促进埃及伊蚊的发育,但降低寨卡病毒的传播能力。
mSphere. 2021 Dec 22;6(6):e0068721. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00687-21. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
8
Dengue and Zika virus infection patterns vary among Aedes aegypti field populations from Belo Horizonte, a Brazilian endemic city.登革热和寨卡病毒感染模式在巴西地方性城市贝洛奥里藏特的埃及伊蚊野外种群中有所不同。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Nov 2;15(11):e0009839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009839. eCollection 2021 Nov.
9
Infection, dissemination, and transmission efficiencies of Zika virus in Aedes aegypti after serial passage in mosquito or mammalian cell lines or alternating passage in both cell types.寨卡病毒在蚊或哺乳动物细胞系中连续传代或在两种细胞类型中交替传代后的感染、传播和传播效率。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 May 18;14(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04726-1.
10
Vector competence of Aedes aegypti and screening for differentially expressed microRNAs exposed to Zika virus.埃及伊蚊的媒介效能与 Zika 病毒感染后差异表达 microRNA 的筛选。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Sep 27;14(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05007-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Why the Jenner/Pasteur paradigm is insufficient for controlling vector-borne diseases and the role of microbiota-mediated interactions.为什么詹纳/巴斯德范式不足以控制媒介传播疾病以及微生物群介导的相互作用的作用。
Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2025 Jul 8;8:100291. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2025.100291. eCollection 2025.
2
Structural and functional significance of AgBR1 flavivirus immunomodulator.黄病毒免疫调节剂AgBR1的结构与功能意义
J Virol. 2025 May 20;99(5):e0187824. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01878-24. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
3
Mosquito Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult mosquito.蚊子细胞图谱:成年蚊子的单核转录组图谱。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 25:2025.02.25.639765. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.25.639765.
4
Advances in antiviral strategies targeting mosquito-borne viruses: cellular, viral, and immune-related approaches.针对蚊媒病毒的抗病毒策略进展:细胞、病毒及免疫相关方法
Virol J. 2025 Feb 4;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02622-z.
5
Early transcriptomic changes at the skin interface during Powassan virus transmission by ticks.蜱传播波瓦桑病毒期间皮肤界面的早期转录组变化
Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 13;15:1511132. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1511132. eCollection 2024.
6
Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms of Mosquito Salivary Proteins: New Frontiers in Disease Transmission and Control.揭示蚊子唾液蛋白的分子机制:疾病传播与控制的新前沿
Biomolecules. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):82. doi: 10.3390/biom15010082.
7
Research progress toward arthropod salivary protein vaccine development for vector-borne infectious diseases.用于媒介传播传染病的节肢动物唾液蛋白疫苗开发的研究进展。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Dec 5;18(12):e0012618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012618. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
The human CD47 checkpoint is targeted by an immunosuppressive salivary factor to enhance arboviral skin infectivity.一种免疫抑制性唾液因子靶向作用于人类 CD47 检查点,以增强虫媒病毒的皮肤感染力。
Sci Immunol. 2024 Aug 9;9(98):eadk9872. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.adk9872.
9
An atlas of human vector-borne microbe interactions reveals pathogenicity mechanisms.人类载体传播微生物相互作用图谱揭示致病机制。
Cell. 2024 Jul 25;187(15):4113-4127.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.023. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
10
Sensing the danger in mosquito spit.感知蚊子唾液中的危险。
EMBO J. 2024 May;43(9):1687-1689. doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00073-w. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Aedes aegypti AgBR1 antibodies modulate early Zika virus infection of mice.埃及伊蚊 AgBR1 抗体可调节小鼠早期寨卡病毒感染。
Nat Microbiol. 2019 Jun;4(6):948-955. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0385-x. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
2
Current status of Zika vaccine development: Zika vaccines advance into clinical evaluation.寨卡疫苗研发的现状:寨卡疫苗进入临床评估阶段。
NPJ Vaccines. 2018 Jun 11;3:24. doi: 10.1038/s41541-018-0061-9. eCollection 2018.
3
Salivary factor LTRIN from Aedes aegypti facilitates the transmission of Zika virus by interfering with the lymphotoxin-β receptor.埃及伊蚊唾液因子 LTRIN 通过干扰淋巴毒素-β 受体促进寨卡病毒的传播。
Nat Immunol. 2018 Apr;19(4):342-353. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0063-9. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
4
Altered vector competence in an experimental mosquito-mouse transmission model of Zika infection.在 Zika 感染的实验性蚊-鼠传播模型中改变了载体的易感性。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Mar 5;12(3):e0006350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006350. eCollection 2018 Mar.
5
Mosquito Biting Modulates Skin Response to Virus Infection.蚊虫叮咬会调节皮肤对病毒感染的反应。
Trends Parasitol. 2017 Aug;33(8):645-657. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 9.
6
TAM Receptors Are Not Required for Zika Virus Infection in Mice.寨卡病毒感染小鼠不需要TAM受体。
Cell Rep. 2017 Apr 18;19(3):558-568. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.058.
7
Anopheline salivary protein genes and gene families: an evolutionary overview after the whole genome sequence of sixteen Anopheles species.按蚊唾液蛋白基因和基因家族:16种按蚊全基因组序列后的进化概述
BMC Genomics. 2017 Feb 13;18(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3579-8.
8
Non-vector-borne transmission of Zika virus: A systematic review.寨卡病毒的非媒介传播:系统评价。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016 Jul-Aug;14(4):313-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
9
Host Inflammatory Response to Mosquito Bites Enhances the Severity of Arbovirus Infection.宿主对蚊虫叮咬的炎症反应会加重虫媒病毒感染的严重程度。
Immunity. 2016 Jun 21;44(6):1455-69. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.002.
10
Prevention and Control of Zika as a Mosquito-Borne and Sexually Transmitted Disease: A Mathematical Modeling Analysis.寨卡作为一种蚊媒和性传播疾病的预防和控制:数学建模分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 17;6:28070. doi: 10.1038/srep28070.