Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via San Massimo 4, 10123, Turin, TO, Italy.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):575-595. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00104-4. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
Safe-by-design (SBD) frameworks for the development of emerging technologies have become an ever more popular means by which scholars argue that transformative emerging technologies can safely incorporate human values. One such popular SBD methodology is called value sensitive design (VSD). A central tenet of this design methodology is to investigate stakeholder values and design those values into technologies during early stage research and development. To accomplish this, the VSD framework mandates that designers consult the philosophical and ethical literature to best determine how to weigh moral trade-offs. However, the VSD framework also concedes the universalism of moral values, particularly the values of freedom, autonomy, equality trust and privacy justice. This paper argues that the VSD methodology, particularly applied to nano-bio-info-cogno technologies, has an insufficient grounding for the determination of moral values. As such, an exploration of the value-investigations of VSD are deconstructed to illustrate both its strengths and weaknesses. This paper also provides possible modalities for the strengthening of the VSD methodology, particularly through the application of moral imagination and how moral imagination exceeds the boundaries of moral intuitions in the development of novel technologies.
安全设计(SBD)框架已成为一种越来越流行的方法,学者们认为,变革性的新兴技术可以安全地融入人类价值观。一种流行的 SBD 方法称为价值敏感设计(VSD)。这种设计方法的一个核心原则是调查利益相关者的价值观,并在早期的研究和开发中设计这些价值观到技术中。为了实现这一目标,VSD 框架要求设计师参考哲学和伦理文献,以最好地确定如何权衡道德权衡。然而,VSD 框架也承认道德价值观的普遍性,特别是自由、自主、平等、信任和隐私正义的价值观。本文认为,VSD 方法,特别是应用于纳米生物技术信息认知技术,对于确定道德价值观的基础不足。因此,本文解构了 VSD 的价值研究,以说明其优缺点。本文还提供了加强 VSD 方法的可能模式,特别是通过应用道德想象力,以及道德想象力如何在开发新技术时超越道德直觉的界限。