Philosophy Section, Delft University of Technology, P.O.Box 5015, 2600 GA, Delft, Netherlands.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):271-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9198-2. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
Recently, there is increased attention to the integration of moral values into the conception, design, and development of emerging IT. The most reviewed approach for this purpose in ethics and technology so far is Value-Sensitive Design (VSD). This article considers VSD as the prime candidate for implementing normative considerations into design. Its methodology is considered from a conceptual, analytical, normative perspective. The focus here is on the suitability of VSD for integrating moral values into the design of technologies in a way that joins in with an analytical perspective on ethics of technology. Despite its promising character, it turns out that VSD falls short in several respects: (1) VSD does not have a clear methodology for identifying stakeholders, (2) the integration of empirical methods with conceptual research within the methodology of VSD is obscure, (3) VSD runs the risk of committing the naturalistic fallacy when using empirical knowledge for implementing values in design, (4) the concept of values, as well as their realization, is left undetermined and (5) VSD lacks a complimentary or explicit ethical theory for dealing with value trade-offs. For the normative evaluation of a technology, I claim that an explicit and justified ethical starting point or principle is required. Moreover, explicit attention should be given to the value aims and assumptions of a particular design. The criteria of adequacy for such an approach or methodology follow from the evaluation of VSD as the prime candidate for implementing moral values in design.
最近,人们越来越关注将道德价值观融入新兴信息技术的概念、设计和开发中。迄今为止,伦理学和技术领域中最受关注的方法是价值敏感设计(VSD)。本文认为 VSD 是将规范性考虑纳入设计的主要候选方法。从概念、分析和规范的角度考虑其方法。这里的重点是 VSD 适合将道德价值观融入技术设计的方式,与技术伦理学的分析视角相结合。尽管 VSD 具有很大的潜力,但事实证明,它在几个方面存在不足:(1)VSD 没有明确的方法来确定利益相关者;(2)VSD 方法论中,实证方法与概念研究的结合不明确;(3)VSD 在将实证知识用于设计中的价值实施时,有犯自然主义谬误的风险;(4)价值的概念及其实现仍然不确定;(5)VSD 缺乏处理价值权衡的补充或明确的伦理理论。对于技术的规范性评估,我主张需要一个明确和合理的伦理起点或原则。此外,还应特别关注特定设计的价值目标和假设。这种方法或方法的充分性标准源自对 VSD 的评估,因为它是将道德价值观融入设计的主要候选方法。