Department of Psychology.
Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Apr;148(4):601-618. doi: 10.1037/xge0000558.
All experimenters know that human and animal subjects do not respond uniformly to experimental treatments. Yet theories and findings in experimental psychology either ignore this causal effect heterogeneity or treat it as uninteresting error. This is the case even when data are available to examine effect heterogeneity directly, in within-subjects designs where experimental effects can be examined subject by subject. Using data from four repeated-measures experiments, we show that effect heterogeneity can be modeled readily, that its discovery presents exciting opportunities for theory and methods, and that allowing for it in study designs is good research practice. This evidence suggests that experimenters should work from the assumption that causal effects are heterogeneous. Such a working assumption will be of particular benefit, given the increasing diversity of subject populations in psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
所有实验人员都知道,人类和动物的实验对象不会对实验处理表现出一致的反应。然而,实验心理学中的理论和发现要么忽略了这种因果效应异质性,要么将其视为无趣的误差。即使有数据可用于直接检查效应异质性,在每个被试都可单独检查实验效应的被试内设计中也是如此。我们使用来自四个重复测量实验的数据表明,很容易对效应异质性进行建模,发现效应异质性为理论和方法提供了令人兴奋的机会,在研究设计中允许这种效应异质性是良好的研究实践。这一证据表明,实验人员应该从因果效应是异质的这一假设出发。鉴于心理学中被试群体的多样性不断增加,这种工作假设将特别有益。