Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, UIC, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, UIC, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dent Mater. 2019 Jun;35(6):900-908. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
Surface conditioning of enamel and dentin is a key step during adhesive restorative procedures and strategies. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of five α-hydroxy-acids (AHAs) as enamel and dentin surface etchants.
Enamel and dentin specimens were prepared from human molars to determine the depth of demineralization by optical profilometry (Δz), the resin bond strength to enamel and dentin (μTBS), the micro-permeability of dentin-resin interfaces, and the gelatinolytic activity of dentin matrix induced by AHAs [glycolic (GA), lactic (LA), citric (CA), malic (MI) and tartaric (TA)] and controls [phosphoric (PA) and maleic (MA)]. All acids were prepared at 35% concentration. Adhesion studies employed Adper Single Bond Plus bonding system. Data were individually processed and analyzed by ANOVA, post-hoc tests and Pearson correlations (α = 0.05).
AHA exhibited statistically lower depth of demineralization of enamel and dentin (average 4 fold) than controls (p < 0.001). In enamel, MA and PA etching resulted in higher μTBS than AHA groups (p < 0.001). In dentin, GA, TA, CI and LA etching resulted in statistically similar μTBS than PA (p < 0.05). The hybrid-layer (HL) thickness and interfacial micro-permeability intensity were statistically lower for AHA groups (p < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was observed between the intensity of micro-permeability and the thickness of HL (p < 0.05). AHA etchants elicited lower dentin enzymatic activity than controls (p < 0.05).
AHAs effectively etched enamel and dentin surfaces. In particular, GA and TA resulted in suitable μTBS and sealing ability as well as induced less gelatinolytic activity in dentin than PA and MA.
牙釉质和牙本质的表面处理是黏接修复程序中的关键步骤和策略。本研究旨在探讨五种α-羟基酸(AHAs)作为牙釉质和牙本质表面蚀刻剂的有效性。
从人磨牙中制备牙釉质和牙本质标本,通过光学轮廓测量法(Δz)确定脱矿深度、牙釉质和牙本质的树脂结合强度(μTBS)、牙本质-树脂界面的微渗透性以及 AHAs[ 甘醇酸(GA)、乳酸(LA)、柠檬酸(CA)、苹果酸(MI)和酒石酸(TA)]和对照物[磷酸(PA)和马来酸(MA)]诱导的牙本质基质的明胶酶活性。所有酸均以 35%浓度制备。黏接研究采用 Adper Single Bond Plus 黏接系统。使用方差分析、事后检验和 Pearson 相关性(α = 0.05)分别对数据进行个体处理和分析。
与对照物相比(p < 0.001),AHAs 显示出统计学上更低的牙釉质和牙本质脱矿深度(平均 4 倍)。在牙釉质中,MA 和 PA 蚀刻导致比 AHA 组更高的 μTBS(p < 0.001)。在牙本质中,GA、TA、CI 和 LA 蚀刻导致与 PA 相比具有统计学上相似的 μTBS(p < 0.05)。与 AHA 组相比,混合层(HL)厚度和界面微渗透性强度统计学上更低(p < 0.05)。微渗透性强度与 HL 厚度之间存在显著正相关(p < 0.05)。AHA 蚀刻剂引起的牙本质酶活性低于对照物(p < 0.05)。
AHAs 有效地蚀刻了牙釉质和牙本质表面。特别是 GA 和 TA 与 PA 和 MA 相比,在牙本质中产生了合适的 μTBS 和密封能力,并且诱导的明胶酶活性较低。