Sanders J, Channon Sue, Gobat Nina, Bennert Kristina, Addison Katy, Robling Mike
Clinical Nursing and Midwifery, School of Healthcare Sciences, Room 1.7, Ty Dewi Sant,Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN UK.
2Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK.
BMC Nurs. 2019 Apr 2;18:13. doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0338-y. eCollection 2019.
The Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) programme was introduced to support young first-time mothers. A randomised trial found FNP added little short-term benefit compared to usual care. The study included a comprehensive parallel process evaluation, including focus groups, conducted to aid understanding of the introduction of the programme into a new service and social context. The aim of the focus groups was to investigate views of key health professionals towards the integration and delivery of FNP programme in England.
Focus groups were conducted separately with Family Nurses, Health Visitors and Midwives at trial sites during 2011-2012. Transcripts from audio-recordings were analysed thematically.
A total of 122 professionals participated in one of 19 focus groups. Family Nurses were confident in the effectiveness of FNP, although they experienced practical difficulties meeting programme fidelity targets and considered that programme goals did not sufficiently reflect client or community priorities. Health Visitors and Midwives regarded FNP as well-resourced and beneficial to clients, describing their own services as undervalued and struggling. They wished to work closely with Family Nurses, but felt excluded from doing so by practical barriers and programme protection.
FNP was described as well-resourced and delivered by highly motivated and well supported Family Nurses. FNP eligibility, content and outcomes conflicted with individual client and community priorities. These factors may have restricted the potential effectiveness of a programme developed and previously tested in a different social milieu. Building Blocks ISRCTN23019866 Registered 20/04/2009.
家庭护士伙伴关系(FNP)项目旨在为首次生育的年轻母亲提供支持。一项随机试验发现,与常规护理相比,FNP在短期效益方面收效甚微。该研究包括一项全面的平行过程评估,其中包括焦点小组,旨在帮助理解该项目在新的服务和社会背景下的引入情况。焦点小组的目的是调查关键卫生专业人员对FNP项目在英格兰的整合与实施的看法。
2011年至2012年期间,在试验地点分别与家庭护士、健康访视员和助产士进行了焦点小组访谈。对录音转录本进行了主题分析。
共有122名专业人员参加了19个焦点小组中的一个。家庭护士对FNP的有效性充满信心,尽管他们在实现项目保真度目标方面遇到了实际困难,并认为项目目标没有充分反映服务对象或社区的优先事项。健康访视员和助产士认为FNP资源充足且对服务对象有益,称他们自己的服务被低估且举步维艰。他们希望与家庭护士密切合作,但感到由于实际障碍和项目保护而被排除在外。
FNP被描述为资源充足,由积极性高且得到充分支持的家庭护士实施。FNP的资格标准、内容和结果与服务对象个人及社区的优先事项相冲突。这些因素可能限制了一个在不同社会环境中开发并先前进行过测试的项目的潜在效果。构建模块ISRCTN23019866于2009年4月20日注册。