University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Semin Perinatol. 2019 Aug;43(5):273-281. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
Recent World Health Organization (WHO) antenatal care recommendations include an ultrasound scan as a part of routine antenatal care. The First Look Study, referenced in the WHO recommendation, subsequently shows that the routine use of ultrasound during antenatal care in rural, low-income settings did not improve maternal, fetal or neonatal mortality, nor did it increase women's use of antenatal care or the rate of hospital births. This article reviews the First Look Study, reconsidering the assumptions upon which it was built in light of these results, a supplemental descriptive study of interviews with patients and sonographers that participated in the First Look study intervention, and a review of the literature. Two themes surface from this review. The first is that focused emphasis on building the pregnancy risk screening skills of rural primary health care personnel may not lead to adaptations in referral hospital processes that could benefit the patient accordingly. The second is that agency to improve the quality of patient reception at referral hospitals may need to be manufactured for obstetric ultrasound screening, or remote pregnancy risk screening more generally, to have the desired impact. Stemming from the literature, this article goes on to examine the potential for complementarity between obstetric ultrasound screening and another approach encouraged by the WHO, the maternity waiting home. Each approach may address existing shortcomings in how the other is currently understood. This paper concludes by proposing a path toward developing and testing such a hybrid approach.
最近世界卫生组织(WHO)的产前护理建议包括将超声扫描作为常规产前护理的一部分。在 WHO 建议中提到的“第一眼研究”随后表明,在农村低收入环境中常规使用超声进行产前护理并没有改善孕产妇、胎儿或新生儿的死亡率,也没有增加妇女接受产前护理的比例或住院分娩率。本文回顾了“第一眼研究”,根据这些结果重新考虑了其建立的假设,对参与“第一眼研究”干预的患者和超声医师进行了补充描述性访谈,并对文献进行了回顾。从这次审查中出现了两个主题。第一个是,集中精力提高农村初级卫生保健人员的妊娠风险筛查技能,可能不会导致转诊医院流程的相应调整,从而使患者受益。第二个是,可能需要为产科超声筛查,或更广泛地说,为远程妊娠风险筛查制造改善转诊医院接待质量的机构,以产生预期的影响。本文从文献中进一步探讨了产科超声筛查与 WHO 鼓励的另一种方法——母婴等候之家之间的互补性。每种方法都可能解决另一种方法目前存在的理解缺陷。本文最后提出了一种开发和测试这种混合方法的途径。