管理互动中的关系自主性：智障人士。
Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with intellectual disabilities.
机构信息
Norah Fry Centre for Disability Studies, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
出版信息
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Sep;32(5):1058-1066. doi: 10.1111/jar.12595. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
This article is about interactions that occur when someone with intellectual disabilities is engaged in everyday activities with a personal assistant (PA) or a support worker.
METHOD
We examine the detail of nine hours of naturally occurring video-recorded interactions, to explore how "relational autonomy" is done in practice. Nine people with ID and seven staff took part in the research, which took place in England from 2016-17.
RESULTS
We selected six extracts to illustrate different types of joint decision-making. Informed by inclusive research with a drama group of people with intellectual disabilities, we focus on the ways in which (a) future plans are discussed; (b) choices are offered during an activity; (c) people reflect on their decisions.
CONCLUSION
The article concludes with discussion about the teaching and learning content of choice-making, on relational autonomy, and the practice learning for PAs, support workers and for people with intellectual disabilities.
摘要
背景
本文探讨了智障人士在与个人助理（PA）或支持人员进行日常活动时发生的互动。
方法
我们检查了九个小时的自然发生的视频记录互动，以探索如何在实践中实现“关系自主权”。九名智障人士和七名工作人员参加了这项于 2016-17 年在英国进行的研究。
结果
我们选择了六个摘录来展示不同类型的联合决策。在一个由智障人士组成的戏剧小组进行的包容性研究的基础上，我们关注了（a）未来计划的讨论方式；（b）活动期间提供的选择；（c）人们对自己决策的反思。
结论
本文最后讨论了关于关系自主权的决策制定、教学和学习内容，以及对个人助理、支持人员和智障人士的实践学习。
相似文献
1
Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with intellectual disabilities.管理互动中的关系自主性：智障人士。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Sep;32(5):1058-1066. doi: 10.1111/jar.12595. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
'It's my home and your work': the views of a filmed vignette describing a challenging everyday situation from the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities.“这是我的家，而你的工作”：一段视频短片中的观点，从智障人士的视角描述了一个具有挑战性的日常情景。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1468198. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1468198.
3
'It's my life': autonomy and people with intellectual disabilities.“这是我的生活”：自主性与智障人士
J Intellect Disabil. 2015 Mar;19(1):5-21. doi: 10.1177/1744629514564691. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
4
Searching for a dynamic equilibrium in decision making: the voices of adults with mild intellectual disability and their significant others in Hong Kong.寻找决策中的动态平衡：来自香港轻度智力障碍成年人及其重要他人的声音。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5141-5151. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1925978. Epub 2021 May 25.
5
Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.为智障人士提供支持性决策和个人自主：《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Winter;41(4):792-806, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12090.
6
Respecting autonomy in the end-of-life care of people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative multiple-case study.尊重智障人士临终关怀中的自主权：一项定性多案例研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Apr;58(4):368-80. doi: 10.1111/jir.12023. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
7
'It's our everyday life' - The perspectives of persons with intellectual disabilities in Norway.“这就是我们的日常生活”——挪威智障人士的观点。
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jun;24(2):143-157. doi: 10.1177/1744629518774174. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
Key components of supporting and assessing decision making ability.支持和评估决策能力的关键要素。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Sep-Oct;72:101613. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101613. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
Comparing everyday autonomy and adult identity in young people with and without intellectual disabilities.比较有和没有智力障碍的年轻人的日常自主性和成人身份认同。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Nov;33(6):1318-1327. doi: 10.1111/jar.12751. Epub 2020 May 25.
10
The Meaning of 'choice and control' for People with Intellectual Disabilities who are Planning their Social Care and Support.“选择与控制”对规划社会照料与支持的智障人士的意义
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017 Jan;30(1):97-108. doi: 10.1111/jar.12222. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
引用本文的文献
1
Change, continuity, and decision-making in the transition to old-age retirement from work and day activity services: qualitative longitudinal follow-up.从工作和日常活动服务过渡到老年退休过程中的变化、连续性和决策制定：定性纵向随访
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2557076. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2557076. Epub 2025 Sep 10.
2
Experiences and perceptions of everyday decision-making in the lives of adults with intellectual disabilities, their care partners and direct care support workers.智力残疾成年人、他们的护理伙伴及直接护理支持工作者在日常生活决策中的经历与认知。
J Intellect Disabil. 2025 Sep;29(3):683-705. doi: 10.1177/17446295231189020. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
3
Persevering professionals: dilemmas of relationships and self-determination in work with people with intellectual disability - a multi-method study based on interpersonal process recall.坚持不懈的专业人士：智力障碍者工作中的关系和自我决定的困境——基于人际过程回忆的多方法研究。
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Jun;28(2):453-468. doi: 10.1177/17446295231154126. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Between the convention and conventional practice: Israeli social workers' recommendations regarding the legal capacity of people with disabilities.在惯例与常规做法之间：以色列社会工作者关于残疾人法律能力的建议。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 May;35(3):826-833. doi: 10.1111/jar.12986. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
本文引用的文献
1
When the larger objective matters more: support workers' epistemic and deontic authority over adult service-users.当更广泛的目标更为重要时：支持工作人员对成年服务使用者的认知权威和道义权威。
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Nov;41(8):1549-1567. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12964. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
2
The Meaning of 'choice and control' for People with Intellectual Disabilities who are Planning their Social Care and Support.“选择与控制”对规划社会照料与支持的智障人士的意义
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017 Jan;30(1):97-108. doi: 10.1111/jar.12222. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
3
Becoming a mother: Supported decision-making in context.成为母亲：情境中的支持性决策制定。
J Intellect Disabil. 2016 Dec;20(4):313-328. doi: 10.1177/1744629515604552. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
4
Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: an ecological model of social networks and community participation.界定智力和发育障碍者的社会融入：社会网络与社区参与的生态模型
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Mar;38:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
5
Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.为智障人士提供支持性决策和个人自主：《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Winter;41(4):792-806, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12090.
6
Relational Autonomy in Assisted Living: A Focus on Diverse Care Settings for Older Adults.辅助生活中的关系自主性：关注老年人的多样化护理环境。
J Aging Stud. 2012 Apr 1;26(2):214-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
7
Two conversational practices for encouraging adults with intellectual disabilities to reflect on their activities.两种促进智障成年人反思自身活动的会话实践。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Jun;57(6):580-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01572.x. Epub 2012 May 4.
8
Identifying teachable moments for health behavior counseling in primary care.识别初级保健中进行健康行为咨询的可教时刻。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):e8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
9
Living 'a life like ours': support workers' accounts of substitute decision-making in residential care homes for adults with intellectual disabilities.过“我们这样的生活”：支持工作人员在成人智障人士居住护理院中的替代决策的叙述。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Feb;54(2):144-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01228.x. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
10
Offering choices to people with intellectual disabilities: an interactional study.为智障人士提供选择：一项互动研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 Dec;52(12):1165-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01101.x. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
Zotero 插件