Weibel David, di Francesco Roman, Kopf Roland, Fahrni Samuel, Brunner Adrian, Kronenberg Philipp, Lobmaier Janek S, Reber Thomas P, Mast Fred W, Wissmath Bartholomäus
Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
w hoch 2, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 21;10:626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00626. eCollection 2019.
In an experiment, effects of commercials that are either shown within a TV program or embedded in YouTube videos were compared. These two media environments have not yet been compared empirically in terms of their advertising impact. A within-subjects design and a multi-method approach were used ( = 36). Eye tracking data show that more attention is allocated to advertisements that appear within a TV program compared to the YouTube-condition and the viewing experience elicited more positive emotions in the TV-condition. Two days after reception, no difference in recognition, likeability, and purchase intention occurred, but in terms of implicit long-term memory: In the TV condition, brands that were previously advertised but no longer remembered elicited stronger skin conductance change than brands for which no advertisements had previously been shown. In terms of advertising impact, TV seems to still be the better choice for advertisers. Presentation mode should be considered in future evaluation of advertisement potential.
在一项实验中,对在电视节目中播放或嵌入YouTube视频中的广告效果进行了比较。这两种媒体环境在广告影响力方面尚未进行实证比较。采用了被试内设计和多方法研究方法(n = 36)。眼动追踪数据显示,与YouTube环境相比,人们对出现在电视节目中的广告分配了更多注意力,并且观看体验在电视环境中引发了更积极的情绪。在接收两天后,在认知、喜爱度和购买意愿方面没有差异,但在隐性长期记忆方面:在电视环境中,之前做过广告但不再被记住的品牌比之前未展示过广告的品牌引发了更强的皮肤电导率变化。就广告影响力而言,电视似乎仍然是广告商的更好选择。在未来对广告潜力的评估中应考虑呈现模式。