Sabido Rafael, Pombero Luis, Hernández-Davó Jose L
Sports Research Center, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain.
Sports Research Center, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain -
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Nov;59(11):1805-1811. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09425-8. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
Eccentric overload training (EOT) has been proposed as an effective stimulus to optimize dynamic athletic performance. Nevertheless, the appropriate intensity during EOT remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the inertial load used during an EOT program on performance adaptations in rugby union players.
Fifteen rugby players were divided into a low (0.025 kg·m2; G 0.025) or a high (0.075 kg·m2; G 0.075) inertial load for training. Both groups trained using the flywheel half squat exercise twice a week during the seven-week EOT. Athletic performance was evaluated by testing the half squat maximum repetition (1RM), countermovement jump (CMJ), 40 m linear sprint, the modified agility T-Test, and power output in the flywheel squat exercise. Data were analysed using magnitude-based inferences.
Both groups improved their 1RM and CMJ to a similar extent. Nevertheless, the G 0.025 showed likely trivial changes in linear sprint (ES=-0.02), and possibly positive effects on the agility T-Test (ES=0.16), while the G 0.075 showed possibly negative effects on 40 m linear sprint (ES=-0.23) and likely trivial effects on the T-Test (ES=0.07).
Due to the similar gains in 1RM and CMJ, and the superior maintenance in linear sprint, the use of low inertial loads during EOT may be a better option when looking for athletic performance optimization.
离心超负荷训练(EOT)已被认为是优化动态运动表现的有效刺激方式。然而,EOT期间的适当强度仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估EOT计划中使用的惯性负荷对英式橄榄球联盟球员运动表现适应性的影响。
15名橄榄球运动员被分为低惯性负荷组(0.025 kg·m2;G 0.025)或高惯性负荷组(0.075 kg·m2;G 0.075)进行训练。在为期7周的EOT期间,两组均每周进行两次飞轮半蹲训练。通过测试半蹲最大重复次数(1RM)、反向纵跳(CMJ)、40米直线冲刺、改良敏捷T测试以及飞轮深蹲训练中的功率输出,来评估运动表现。数据采用基于量级的推断进行分析。
两组的1RM和CMJ均有相似程度的提高。然而,G 0.025组在直线冲刺方面可能只有微小变化(效应量ES = -0.02),在敏捷T测试中可能有积极影响(ES = 0.16),而G 0.075组在40米直线冲刺中可能有负面影响(ES = -0.23),在T测试中可能只有微小影响(ES = 0.07)。
由于1RM和CMJ的提升相似,且直线冲刺方面保持得更好,在寻求优化运动表现时,EOT期间使用低惯性负荷可能是更好的选择。