• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Nature and Quality of Australian Supermarkets' Policies that can Impact Public Health Nutrition, and Evidence of their Practical Application: A Cross-Sectional Study.澳大利亚超市政策对公共健康营养的影响的性质和质量,以及其实践应用的证据:一项横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 15;11(4):853. doi: 10.3390/nu11040853.
2
Global supermarkets' corporate social responsibility commitments to public health: a content analysis.全球超市的企业社会责任对公共健康的承诺:内容分析。
Global Health. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0440-z.
3
The extent and nature of supermarket own brand foods in Australia: study protocol for describing the contribution of selected products to the healthfulness of food environments.澳大利亚超市自有品牌食品的范围和性质:描述选定产品对食品环境健康度贡献的研究方案。
Nutr J. 2018 Oct 25;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0404-4.
4
Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective.超市自有品牌食品的营养标签与营养质量衡量标准的一致性:澳大利亚视角。
Nutrients. 2018 Oct 9;10(10):1465. doi: 10.3390/nu10101465.
5
The nutritional quality of supermarket own brand chilled convenience foods: an Australian cross-sectional study reveals limitations of the Health Star Rating.超市自有品牌冷藏即食食品的营养质量:澳大利亚横断面研究揭示了健康星级评分的局限性。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Aug;23(12):2068-2077. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000051. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
What are the position and power of supermarkets in the Australian food system, and the implications for public health? A systematic scoping review.超市在澳大利亚食品体系中的地位和作用是什么?对公共健康有哪些影响?一项系统的范围综述。
Obes Rev. 2018 Feb;19(2):198-218. doi: 10.1111/obr.12635. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
7
The nature of UK supermarkets' policies on checkout food and associations with healthfulness and type of food displayed: cross-sectional study.英国超市关于结账食品政策的性质及其与健康和展示食品类型的关联:横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 11;15(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0684-2.
8
Availability and placement of healthy and discretionary food in Australian supermarkets by chain and level of socio-economic disadvantage.澳大利亚连锁超市中健康和可自由支配食品的供应和位置,按社会经济劣势程度划分。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Feb;24(2):203-214. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002505. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
9
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
10
The Healthiness of Food and Beverages on Price Promotion at Promotional Displays: A Cross-Sectional Audit of Australian Supermarkets.促销展示中促销食品和饮料的健康度:对澳大利亚超市的跨部门审计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 3;17(23):9026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239026.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Food Safety: Taxonomization of Private Initiatives to Design of Healthier Supermarket Environments.超越食品安全:将私人举措分类以设计更健康的超市环境。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2025 May 28;14(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s13668-025-00660-1.
2
Drivers of consumer food choices of multinational corporations' products over local foods in Ghana: a maximum difference scaling study.跨国公司产品相对于加纳本地食品,消费者选择其作为食物的驱动因素:最大差异标度研究。
Global Health. 2024 Mar 19;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01027-x.
3
A systems framework for implementing healthy food retail in grocery settings.在杂货店环境中实施健康食品零售的系统框架。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17075-8.
4
The Promotion of Sustainable Diets in the Healthcare System and Implications for Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.在医疗体系中推广可持续饮食对健康专业人员的影响:范围综述。
Nutrients. 2021 Feb 26;13(3):747. doi: 10.3390/nu13030747.
5
Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas.探讨贫困地区幼儿父母的喂养行为和食物素养。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 4;18(4):1496. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041496.
6
Public health response to ultra-processed food and drinks.公共卫生应对超加工食品和饮料。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 26;369:m2391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2391.
7
The Effects of a Supermarket-Based Intervention on the Nutritional Quality of Private-Label Foods: A Prospective Study.基于超市的干预对自有品牌食品营养质量的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 5;12(6):1692. doi: 10.3390/nu12061692.

本文引用的文献

1
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
2
Global supermarkets' corporate social responsibility commitments to public health: a content analysis.全球超市的企业社会责任对公共健康的承诺:内容分析。
Global Health. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0440-z.
3
The extent and nature of supermarket own brand foods in Australia: study protocol for describing the contribution of selected products to the healthfulness of food environments.澳大利亚超市自有品牌食品的范围和性质:描述选定产品对食品环境健康度贡献的研究方案。
Nutr J. 2018 Oct 25;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0404-4.
4
Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective.超市自有品牌食品的营养标签与营养质量衡量标准的一致性:澳大利亚视角。
Nutrients. 2018 Oct 9;10(10):1465. doi: 10.3390/nu10101465.
5
The nature of UK supermarkets' policies on checkout food and associations with healthfulness and type of food displayed: cross-sectional study.英国超市关于结账食品政策的性质及其与健康和展示食品类型的关联:横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 11;15(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0684-2.
6
Australian consumers' views towards an environmentally sustainable eating pattern.澳大利亚消费者对环境可持续饮食模式的看法。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Oct;21(14):2714-2722. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001192. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
What are the position and power of supermarkets in the Australian food system, and the implications for public health? A systematic scoping review.超市在澳大利亚食品体系中的地位和作用是什么?对公共健康有哪些影响?一项系统的范围综述。
Obes Rev. 2018 Feb;19(2):198-218. doi: 10.1111/obr.12635. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
8
Ultra-processed family foods in Australia: nutrition claims, health claims and marketing techniques.澳大利亚超加工家庭食品:营养声称、健康声称和营销技巧。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):38-48. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001148. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
9
Food systems transformations, ultra-processed food markets and the nutrition transition in Asia.亚洲的食物系统转型、超加工食品市场与营养转型
Global Health. 2016 Dec 3;12(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0223-3.
10
Exploring power and influence in nutrition policy in Australia.探索澳大利亚营养政策中的权力与影响。
Obes Rev. 2016 Dec;17(12):1218-1225. doi: 10.1111/obr.12459. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

澳大利亚超市政策对公共健康营养的影响的性质和质量,以及其实践应用的证据:一项横断面研究。

The Nature and Quality of Australian Supermarkets' Policies that can Impact Public Health Nutrition, and Evidence of their Practical Application: A Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia, Australia.

Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, PO Box 855, West Perth 6872, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2019 Apr 15;11(4):853. doi: 10.3390/nu11040853.

DOI:10.3390/nu11040853
PMID:30991733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6520865/
Abstract

Improving population diets is a public health priority, and calls have been made for corporations such as supermarkets to contribute. Supermarkets hold a powerful position within the food system, and one source of power is supermarket own brand foods (SOBFs). Many of the world's largest supermarkets have corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies that can impact public health, but little is known about their quality or practical application. This study examines the nature and quality of Australian supermarkets' CSR policies that can impact public health nutrition, and provides evidence of practical applications for SOBFs. A content analysis of CSR policies was conducted. Evidence of supermarkets putting CSR policies into practice was derived from observational audits of 3940 SOBFs in three large exemplar supermarkets (Coles, Woolworths, IGA) in Perth, Western Australia (WA). All supermarkets had some CSR policies that could impact public health nutrition; however, over half related to sustainability, and many lacked specificity. All supermarkets sold some nutritious SOBFs, using marketing techniques that made them visible. Findings suggest Australian supermarket CSR policies are not likely to adequately contribute to improving population diets or sustainability of food systems. Setting robust and meaningful targets, and improving transparency and specificity of CSR policies, would improve the nature and quality of supermarket CSR policies and increase the likelihood of a public health benefit.

摘要

改善人口饮食是公共卫生的当务之急,有人呼吁超市等企业为此做出贡献。超市在食品系统中拥有强大的地位,其权力来源之一是超市自有品牌食品(SOBF)。许多全球最大的超市都有影响公共健康的企业社会责任(CSR)政策,但人们对这些政策的质量或实际应用知之甚少。本研究考察了澳大利亚超市影响公共健康营养的 CSR 政策的性质和质量,并提供了 SOBFs 实际应用的证据。对 CSR 政策进行了内容分析。从澳大利亚西澳大利亚州珀斯的三家大型超市(科尔斯、伍尔沃思、IGA)对 3940 种 SOBF 进行的观察性审计中得出了超市将 CSR 政策付诸实践的证据。所有超市都有一些可能影响公共健康营养的 CSR 政策;然而,超过一半的政策与可持续性有关,许多政策缺乏具体性。所有超市都销售一些营养丰富的 SOBF,并使用使它们更显眼的营销技术。研究结果表明,澳大利亚超市的 CSR 政策不太可能充分有助于改善人口饮食或食品系统的可持续性。制定稳健和有意义的目标,并提高 CSR 政策的透明度和具体性,将改善超市 CSR 政策的性质和质量,并增加对公共健康有益的可能性。